| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Jason Tests |
| From: | "Dexter McIntyre W4DEX" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:56:56 +0000 |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
James Moritz wrote: I can run the beacon again tonight in anyone is interested - is 135.910kHz a good frequency, or is there a better one? Jim,I was watching your frequency last night but saw nothing identifiable. I have loran lines close to .910 that are strong enough to make JASON copy difficult. I spent some time moving up the band looking for a better frequency. For me 135.990 is about the best I found between 135.900 to 136.000 but even so that frequency isn't clear. No need to move on my account for tonight since there will probably be a lot of QRN in my area. I will continue to look at the band for a slot that is clear here. Dexter |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Subject : Subject lines, Talbot Andrew |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: Radiated power, Alberto di Bene |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Jason Tests, James Moritz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Jason Tests / PSK31, jannsen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |