Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Jason Tests

from [James Moritz] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Jason Tests
From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 15:57:55 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]> 
At 13:50 23/01/2002 +0000, you wrote:

Dear Jim,

>I can run the beacon again tonight in anyone is interested - is 135.910kHz
>a good frequency, or is there a better one?

May I look at it the other way?  137.5xxx is an absolute mass of lines here.

73, Brian
73 Brian     CT1DRP     IN51QD     41 09 58N  08 39 11W
http://homepage.esoterica.pt/~brian


Dear Brian,
So if I transmit a beacon signal on 135.91 at around 2000utc this evening, would that be OK? 

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: RE: SMT Devices, Talbot Andrew
Next by Date:  LF: Reference Osc. Waveform, Larry Kayser
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: Jason Tests, Brian Rogerson
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Jason Tests, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]