Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+UK\s+\-\s+MF\s+\-\s+LF\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: John Pumford-Green <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 23:37:29 +0000
Not sure what you mean G. There's no solid info about the requeirement for applications for new NoVs for 5MHz either. There's been no definitive statement that existing NoVs will continue, using the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00065.html (11,831 bytes)

2. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 17:45:21 +0100
Mal, In sure if it was a contest band , would of been sorted years ago , number of people walking round the convention with DX T -shirts , looked more like a geologists convention , with I've been to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00083.html (19,989 bytes)

3. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: Chris Osborn <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:36:03 +0000 (GMT)
Chris nil hrd from you at 1850 - 1905 Now QRT de mal/g3kev -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Chris Osborn To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Saturday, D
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00129.html (20,090 bytes)

4. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:34:52 +0100
That's the published situation , but as to why , no indication of when the NOV upgrade is to be made live , that's another story , was it only J Gould pushing things ? now he is out the loop , are we
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00134.html (15,441 bytes)

5. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:06:23 +0100
Chris, Unattended beacon? Uuuh, i know who will complain, hi ;-) I can see you well in MY QRSS/DFCW-10 window, with some QSB. Tried to call you, see attachment... 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 15.12.2012 11:25
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00178.html (13,436 bytes)

6. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 16:55:27 +0100
Graham Since the RAE tick test started, Morse test scrubbed, Beacon mode started, Amateur Radio has declined and has become a joke. I am not surprised OFCOM is not in any hurry. Different story to ye
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00192.html (16,609 bytes)

7. RE: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: "James Cowburn" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:28:39 +0100
Hopefully, it will be a simple webform for exsiting NOV holders. Thanks David, Yes I had read that - "Details (re. NOV applications) will be published soon" As I say - no definitive word. 73 Chris XI
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00218.html (13,506 bytes)

8. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 16:24:40 +0100
Nothing in the last rsgb news of the year then ? There will be no news readings on 23 or 30 December. so that's the surprise announcement theory out the window then ... So what's left phone a friend
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00272.html (15,085 bytes)

9. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:57:25 +0100
Hi John Nice to see your still keeping watch up there (up as in north) Well Im sure 5 will keep rolling on, but with allocations starting to go WW , may be the experimental angle is getting a bit thi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00317.html (12,859 bytes)

10. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:25:39 +0100
There you go , Mal , see these new qso operators , not quite got the idea yet , you have to wait for the other station to stop sending , before calling them ... G ))) From: [email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00368.html (14,127 bytes)

11. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: Chris Osborn <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:00:16 +0000 (GMT)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00380.html (12,336 bytes)

12. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: Chris Osborn <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:54:40 +0000 (GMT)
Graham I can work Moscow on normal CW on LF and MF so QRSS 60000000000 and Beacon Bashing is not necessary. Things are going backwards since the bands were first licensed some years ago. It is diffi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00437.html (17,576 bytes)

13. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:50:42 +0100
Graham Keep me one of those keys. Mine has been used on a ship and knocked about a bit !! 73 de mal/g3kev -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Graham To: [email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00445.html (17,889 bytes)

14. LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: Chris Osborn <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:25:37 +0000 (GMT)
LF/ MF I guess there's still no definitive word from OfCom regarding the new MF band NOV's (?) It's a possibility that the UK will be an MF-free zone over the New Year's holiday period . . With that
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00638.html (12,046 bytes)

15. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 18:30:46 +0100
Graham I can work Moscow on normal CW on LF and MF so QRSS 60000000000 and Beacon Bashing is not necessary. Things are going backwards since the bands were first licensed some years ago. It is diffic
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00665.html (15,358 bytes)

16. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: DENNIS EASTERLING <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:46:20 +0000 (GMT)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00668.html (14,376 bytes)

17. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:23:19 +0100
Ok Mal, We will have to watch and wait, may be the allocation is not a popular as first anticipated , after all , what articles have been published about using the band ? no lectures at the conventio
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00687.html (17,163 bytes)

18. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:07:03 +0100
Chris nil hrd from you at 1850 - 1905 Now QRT de mal/g3kev -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Chris Osborn To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Saturday, De
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00705.html (18,080 bytes)

19. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: David Pratt <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:38:01 +0000
The official word is there, Chris, and has been for some time. All we know is that our existing SRPs expire and will not be renewed. We have to re-apply for an NoV. But how we do it remains to be see
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00706.html (10,184 bytes)

20. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: David Pratt <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:39:22 +0000
I suspect that applications for the 472kHz and 5MHz NoVs could be done via the RSGB website in the same way they did for the GO-- & GQ-- prefixes. The only problem is that there is only a week left b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00711.html (11,144 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu