Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

41. LF: Watford Whistle (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:04:11 +0100
Apart from the interesting account of the nulling experiment, below, I was intrigued by the mention of the "Watford Whistle" - grateful if Jim or others could elaborate on this or known power-line tr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-07/msg00065.html (14,233 bytes)

42. LF: Discussion of HF papers for IARU Region 1 Conference (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:26:34 +0100
This might appear to be "off topic" but I would like to inform all UK Amateurs on this reflector of a discussion group at http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/ukc4discussion/ that has been set up for pri
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-07/msg00071.html (12,149 bytes)

43. LF: Info on Loran transmitters (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:20:10 +0100
Following discussion at yesterday's Spectrum Forum meeting it was agreed that the RSGB would send in a formal complaint. I've been actioned to prepare a draft. Grateful for detail of the spec that th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-07/msg00101.html (8,739 bytes)

44. LF: RE: Re: RE: 500KHz/600m Proposal (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 07:56:20 +0100
Steve, yes - the URL that I referenced mentioned Australia, USA and New Zealand - the USA seem to be making real progress, but not sure of the status in VK and ZL. 73 John, G3WKL John - many thanks i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-07/msg00138.html (11,467 bytes)

45. LF: RE: 500KHz/600m Proposal (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 22:04:56 +0100
I posted a note to this reflector that was written for the RSGB's Spectrum Forum the other day - maybe you and others haven't seen it. The position in the UK is that the RSGB submitted a proposal for
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-07/msg00146.html (12,446 bytes)

46. LF: RE: Fwd: Loran update (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:50:59 +0100
Great news. I was discussing the matter with RSGB HQ only the other week and we had decided to send off a further letter of complaint. Will now re-consider what is the best action. 73 John, G3WKL Int
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-10/msg00171.html (8,720 bytes)

47. LF: Rugby LORAN measurement? (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:28:46 +0200
Given that there may be a short break in LORAN transmission this coming Tuesday I thought that I would post an e-mail requesting measurement of the background noise floor, whilst the Rugby transmitte
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-03/msg00370.html (9,568 bytes)

48. RE: LF: Rugby LORAN measurement? (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 22:31:52 +0100
I'd just like to follow-up Peter's comments re use of his recently developed program to measure SNR as I am keen to get some measurements of the effect of the Rugby transmitter in order to follow-up
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-04/msg00315.html (10,930 bytes)

49. RE: LF: Rugby LORAN measurement? (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 15:36:28 +0200
Dave, thanks for trying. My travelling didn't happen so I was around today after all, however, as we now know the signal didn't switch off. My thanks to Peter for developing a special piece of softwa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-04/msg00326.html (10,430 bytes)

50. RE: LF: Rugby LORAN measurement? (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 13:51:53 +0200
Sorry John, I don't know the times, but I seem to recall seeing a posting from someone on this reflector recently alluding to the "usual first Tuesday in the month" maintenance at Rugby, also known a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-04/msg00329.html (9,690 bytes)

51. LF: 500kHz - UK: Expression of interest (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:09:42 +0100
Without wishing to raise hopes too much, we may be getting close to Ofcom agreeing to issues a few Special Research Permits (SRP) for operation in the band 501 - 504kHz within the UK. It is expected
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-01/msg00006.html (10,772 bytes)

52. RE: LF: Special Research Permits (501-504kHz) for UK Amateurs (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:39:51 +0100
I should have added that it might be reasonable to add a separate sheet with the issue about field-strength, assumptions and how you arrived at the figure in the RFI assessment box 73 John, G3WKL Jim
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-02/msg00014.html (17,940 bytes)

53. RE: LF: Special Research Permits (501-504kHz) for UK Amateurs (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:39:04 +0100
Mal, see the answer to Jim's query. I really wouldn't make a big issue of this. If Ofcom are concerned about whatever we put in for the near-field assessment I feel sure that we will be able to resol
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-02/msg00015.html (17,947 bytes)

54. RE: LF: Special Research Permits (501-504kHz) for UK Amateurs (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:25:34 +0100
Jim, thanks for raising this issue. The SRP is a generic form that often is related to "experiments" with people asking for permission to run high power (for EME, MS, HF, etc), where the field-streng
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-02/msg00017.html (17,398 bytes)

55. LF: Special Research Permits (501-504kHz) for UK Amateurs (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:16:04 +0100
Ofcom has announced today that a limited number of SRPs will me made available for 12 months from 1st March. See http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radiocomms/ifi/licensing/classes/amateur/Notices/200 70221 and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-02/msg00026.html (9,918 bytes)

56. RE: LF: 501 to 504 (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:26:49 +0100
John, you need to understand that we submitted the proposal to our regulator in Sept 2004, so it takes its time over here also. Well done, Dave. Hopefully, there will be some more to follow soon. 73
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-02/msg00046.html (9,064 bytes)

57. RE: LF: RE: RE: Special Research Permits (501-504kHz) for UK Amateurs (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:25:03 +0100
Pete, I would suggest that you mention the work that you have done at 136kHz, etc 73 John, G3WKL --Original Message-- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-02/msg00093.html (9,702 bytes)

58. LF: RE: RE: Special Research Permits (501-504kHz) for UK Amateurs (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:41:33 +0100
I'm busy building a DDS, but if that fails to work in a sensible timescale I'll need to be xtal controlled, so an agreement where we might cluster for QRSS/DFCW might be worthwhile. This might also b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-02/msg00096.html (12,013 bytes)

59. LF: RE: Re: Special Research Permits (501-504kHz) for UK Amateurs (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:28:59 +0100
Walter, individuals will need to apply to use their licence so it will be a little while before any SRPs are issued; hopefully, in time for the 1st March. experimental access they are expecting us to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-02/msg00097.html (10,763 bytes)

60. LF: RE: [500] 500 bandplan? (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 21:35:14 +0100
I'm not keen on another reflector, but someone made a comment a week or so ago that made sense, which was to prefix the title of 500kHz postings. I don't think the suggestion would work in all cases,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-03/msg00091.html (11,030 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu