LF: RE: [500] 500 bandplan?

["John W Gould" <jwgould@iee.org.uk>]

I'm not keen on another reflector, but someone made a comment a week or so ago that made sense, which was to prefix the title of 500kHz postings.  I don't think the suggestion would work in all cases, so I would suggest that we try and put [500], so that people can setup a filter.  I' ve done it on this e-mail as an example

 

I'm happy to leave it to others to decide about a bandplan - just a word of caution about digimodes - for modes such as PSK31 please make sure that the dial frequency chosen doesn't allow any significant energy to be transmitted outside the 501 - 504kHz band!

 

73 John, G3WKL

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Dave Pick
Sent: 13 March 2007 15:20
To: LF Group
Subject: LF: 500 bandplan?

Someone had to 
ask the question "Do we need a band-plan?".

Finbar is beaconing down the 
bottom, which seem OK to me, I've been trying for QSOs near the top because my 
local noises seem to congregate near 501kHz. Do we want to suggest areas for 
different activities like on 136? 
In fact do we need to set up a Google / 
Yahoo group (or is there already one going) for European 500k activity to be 
discussed or is this the place to do it?

Questions 
questions!

Discuss...

Dave.

-- 
G3YXM IO92BK Birmingham 
UK