Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: RE: [500] 500 bandplan? |
| From: | "John W Gould" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:30:42 -0000 |
| Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
|
I'm
not keen on another reflector, but someone made a comment a week or so ago that
made sense, which was to prefix the title of 500kHz postings. I don't
think the suggestion would work in all cases, so I would suggest that we try and
put [500], so that people can setup a filter. I' ve done it on this e-mail
as an example
I'm
happy to leave it to others to decide about a bandplan - just a word of caution
about digimodes - for modes such as PSK31 please make sure that the dial
frequency chosen doesn't allow any significant energy to be transmitted outside
the 501 - 504kHz band!
73
John, G3WKL
-----Original Message----- Someone had to
ask the question "Do we need a band-plan?".From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Pick Sent: 13 March 2007 15:20 To: LF Group Subject: LF: 500 bandplan? Finbar is beaconing down the bottom, which seem OK to me, I've been trying for QSOs near the top because my local noises seem to congregate near 501kHz. Do we want to suggest areas for different activities like on 136? In fact do we need to set up a Google / Yahoo group (or is there already one going) for European 500k activity to be discussed or is this the place to do it? Questions questions! Discuss... Dave. -- G3YXM IO92BK Birmingham UK |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: 500 bandplan?, Gary - G4WGT |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: RE: 500 bandplan?, Dave G3WCB |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: [500] G3XIZ QSO, CHRISTOPHER OSBORN |
| Next by Thread: | LF: RE: 500 bandplan?, Dave G3WCB |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |