| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: 500 bandplan? |
| From: | "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:27:49 -0000 |
| Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
| References: | <[email protected]> <001701c7658e$ae06ef80$0300a8c0@lark> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Alan & All,I agree with the majority comments so far, no band plan yet, and continue to use this reflector. By the way, transmitter nearly completed. 73 Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Melia" My vote goes for the old favourite of "doing nothing 'til it bites us!" ....and a definite "NO" to another reflector ! Plenty of room (bandwidth?) on this one.----- End of Original Message ----- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: 500 Band Plan, hamilton mal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: RE: [500] 500 bandplan?, John W Gould |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: 500 bandplan?, Alan Melia |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: [500] 500 bandplan, and frequencies?, Alan Melia |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |