Gents No positive ID of SK6RUD yet on my grabber (its a little aerial too.. only 1 foot long, but it still sees most of the signals that appear on the main antenna) but I am seeing somthing,, I have
Seen just after last post.... RUD in QRSS, 500KHz dead Not strong enough to hear on the ferrite antenna, but probably OK on the main antenna, (lowered at the moment)
Mike, are you running normal speed cw or QRSS? my grabber goes up to 507.5, though I have never identified anything from NA on the small antenna Tonight there is a faint trace that looks to be keyed
Gents, I have changed the range of my grabber, now it covers 500 to 508 KHz, and produces a larger image (more BW I know, but we will see what the usage is like) a few birdies tonight but BHZ is beac
Gents, WE2XGR/6 is clearly visible on my grabber tonight (allowing for slow QSB) on 507.3 (00:30z) At peaks CW is readable 429 This is on my 1' long ferrite rod antenna. There is a faint unidentified
Hi all, Looks like Jims Beacon was QRV all night, consistant copy peaking -8dB with typical fading episodes Chart of SNR attached hopefully For data analysis purposes any reports betwee 08:00 and 09:
Gents If the signals that are fading at different frequencies are from the same source, then you can determine the difference in path length from the null spacing. (assuming you can see signals over
Well said Mal Telegraphy Greek Tele 'far-off' graph 'writing' Morse code actually is less 'telagraphy' as the end result does not by default get written (by competent cw operators at any rate) Some d
Mal read YOUR licence it was issued by Ofcom for normal people not ex Radio Officers. Ofcom are not part of HM government. It does not refer to any definitions that may or may not appear in the 'Hand
Mal The answer is simple in many cases. Why not? I will explain. You can use a narrower filter if you like, it would have to be 200Hz wide to allow the reception of all WSPR signals in the range of t
Got it working, Will leave the WSPR receiver running on the grabber output when I can.. some funny things happening when I re-sample the audio, but WSPR coping well despite a level problem not yet fi
Jim, Good signal from you on my grabber, still trying to get WSPR to work on the right audio stream.. easier said than done with 3 soundcards, with a softrock RX Regards Mark GM4ISM Dear Jay, LF Grou
Hi all, Please note that the port address of my grabber has changed from 8080 to 8090. 8080 has stopped working, seems to be blocked by somthing externally <( I changed it to 8090 and all is fine. Si
Jim, Mal, LF group We have a great opportunity here for doing some valuable research into propagation. To my knowledge no one has measure fading from a single source at different locations at the sam
Hi Jim, LF Group Fine copy on my grabber / WSPR decode, now I have re-centred the WSPR decoder. I had to change it last week to decode someone.. Interestingly sometimes I am seeing an extra faint tra
Seems that the spambots are censoring mail to this group A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
GR-874 I haven't seen any of those for a while, but I can see how any description of them may be misinterpreted Still I cant see what is wrong with what I sent, but what the heck. For now the WSPR de
Guys, My 600KHz grabber is still QRV, The address port number had to change, and because I don't have a guaranteed static IP address, the best way to get at my grabber is www.dc2light.co.uk/LF_MF.htm
Graham, Your trace is just about visible on the WSPR spectrum display, but not quite loud enough to decode. maybe it will improve later. I would expect to decode you on the main antenna! Amazing what
Hi all, Not withstanding the fickle nature of propagation, my WSPR / Grabber receive antenna is not the most efficient, and does suffer from an elevated noise floor compared to my main station antenn
