Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 296 ]

Total 296 documents matching your query.

101. Re: LF: Re: 73KHz beacon (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 17:36:32 +0100
Hi Alberto, If an short vertical monopole is placed over perfect ground and brought to resonance with a perfect loadingcoil there are no losses, so its performance will be independent of its length.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00343.html (10,237 bytes)

102. Re: LF: A new one (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 17:18:01 +0100
Reiner Nabe wrote: Hi all,a new one from Berlin is QRV, DK7SU, -Rainer -I have worked him on Sutarday and Sunday, rst 549 nr Franfurt.73 ,DL3FDO Hello Reiner I heard both you and DK7SU working and u
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00344.html (8,637 bytes)

103. LF: VIRUS (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 18:36:15 +0000
Hi All Email and other digital communications plagued with various contamination, satellite systems although using FDM and TDM modulation the baseband data is primarily digital. It is just a matter o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00004.html (8,623 bytes)

104. Re: LF: Critisism (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 18:08:14 +0000
Mal, A lot of us would welcome your "critisism" far more if you stuck to technicalities and cut out the cheap sniping at anyone who doesn't see things your way. Walter G3JKV Walter Om Its just that
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00058.html (9,025 bytes)

105. Re: LF: Re: g4ftc (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:24:00 +0000
QTH Camberley, Surrey. Thanks for the report - it looks like my efforts in putting down more radials is paying dividends. I've now got almost a kilometre of 2.5mm^2 wire in my ground system, but my
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00082.html (9,132 bytes)

106. Re: LF: RE: 80m QRSS QRPppp QRT (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:14:23 +0000
I saw nothing, but may have gone for too narrow a bandwidth on the monitoring system - Argo in this case - and missed the signal. What was the frequency ? QRSS would be an interesting way for those
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00083.html (10,075 bytes)

107. Re: LF: DISTANCE 136 KHZ (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:09:26 +0000
[email protected] wrote: In a message dated 11/25/01 6:59:45 PM GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: Hello Its a pity we cannot get more acty going from Southern and Eastern EU. I have
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00084.html (10,175 bytes)

108. LF: DISTANCE 136 KHZ (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 18:51:18 +0000
Hello Its a pity we cannot get more acty going from Southern and Eastern EU. I have been heard in Malta and and other locations in Southern Spain and Eastern EU but no one seems to be getting enthusa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00111.html (9,169 bytes)

109. LF: g4ftc (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 18:40:22 +0000
Nice signal heard and seen from G4FTC this afternoon around 136 khz on slow cw. No indication of location/qth 73 de G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00135.html (7,555 bytes)

110. LF: SLOW CW (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 16:42:19 +0000
Hello Jim That was a nice shot of my signal you took last night just below 136 khz. The speed was 2 wpm, the slowest that I can go with the auto keyer. I was expecting a report from the USA !!!!!!!!!
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00150.html (8,180 bytes)

111. LF: IK5/TEST (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 15:55:08 +0000
I heard IK5ZPV testing on 136 khz last evening at 2212 utc with a very strong signal S8. He did not appear to be listening, no cq etc. Condx seemed very good last night and some of the commercial sta
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00157.html (7,938 bytes)

112. LF: strange (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 20:07:47 +0000
Strangely enough G3AQC is not a strong signal with me either on 136 khz or 73 khz. Perhaps the distance between us is critical, or unusual propogation at the times I have heard his transmission. Some
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00184.html (8,105 bytes)

113. LF: 73 KHZ TA (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 12:48:08 +0000
Well done Laurie and John and full marks for Perseverance, it paid off and I did say in the past it was just a matter of time on both 73 khz and 136khz, when others were saying it was not possible, a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00197.html (8,302 bytes)

114. Re: LF: Measuring Q (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:53:36 +0000
Recently I described some experiments with multilayer coils based on a Decca coil. The resultant coil is now similar to that shown in the LF book, page 13 (See the second coil back) except my coil h
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00221.html (11,776 bytes)

115. LF: RE RF AMPS (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 17:21:16 +0000
Hello Jim and others Ref your long message and detail. I am struggling to get one amp to the antenna but I am measuring at the tx 50 ohm output. Why is my signal the strongest from the UK bar MM0ALM
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00256.html (8,368 bytes)

116. Re: LF: Re: RF AMPS (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 16:55:42 +0000
What big mistake you did in answering to the KEV joker... Best ignore him, and his *hand sent CW* .....:-) You have made the same mistake!!!!!!!!!!! . Are you against free speech and others opinions
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00257.html (9,017 bytes)

117. Re: LF: Info (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 16:27:03 +0000
A G3 responded to [email protected]: "THE FACTS are that I have worked 21 countries on 136 khz two way qso,s. and several EU dx xband with my signal on 136 khz. My reports are generally at least 2
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00259.html (9,921 bytes)

118. LF: phased rx (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 11:34:05 +0000
Walter I did say for space diversity that the more space for antennas the better but I have seen this technique used in a confined space for the lower frequencies where one antenna was vertically pol
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00266.html (8,635 bytes)

119. Re: LF: Long-Baseline Phased Arrays on LF (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 09:13:02 +0000
Probably not many. But in order to gain hands-on experience in aspects of the radio art? Perhaps quite a few! That is one of the well-established purposes of the Amateur Radio Service. Could having
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00267.html (9,954 bytes)

120. Re: LF: RF AMPS (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 09:52:54 +0000
Hello Mal & group, The current you can push through your antenna system depends on the loss resistance you encounter. And this is more than just the ground loss. There is also the loss in the loadin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00268.html (12,488 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu