Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Experimenting..

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Experimenting..
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:48:39 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1547218120; bh=yP/XM4hIUINg2vw8PmxlZFbLUyXR0AnNBvVLfvBTVeI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=qgQ3WKmKbNOWz9cvsH1REIHtj1Hl6eEvjl3r5TEdEevcikhHUIkyJYpLG6CernlIa ixR5hUNonlYI6sbUTVEF80bWChkt5S1iT7DiyufwplrvXJNYdMg9l2aoEdpjg+ruj3 gFRierhBLdlkgJz6OEFDRHxqjcWNFBTBtdUVeIKPzohue+h2Hq6hMk7E7+tikJ1laX f5Ya9cIc6qVJDG04B/sD7mIaAjpHpWD92Cpw9kAMFabkP142zoCmeQsMfhtJSJwU7d GNROy0AU5ZlFt96WPv4fdDpFrjYK8MIXenq+1hUU+4klyDNz2oc9dkV8XaQ0b3I3XI Ez3UPOinTVJfw==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <CANA3B6V=UBmf2hJcxOkH7p1hMuHaTBP3uduy7rL-=kL5Mw1p3Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6VefKy=hYMunqXtFJ18W=zB-Dj-htgNNv0=bJivS2T54g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6UDWT69iZtOBgmP+csuU1FvK3nrbY_EpEE3J8JtnqJbvw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA3151334E@servigilant.vigilant.local> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3


From: Neil <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, 10 January 2019, 21:23

I imagine lots of people are considering the use of long lengths of metal infrastructure

Do you really? How many, make a guess. What are they waiting for?

so if there is a solution which is demonstrably better, it would save a lot of unnecessary trouble for experimenters.

What is experimenting? Isn't it doing some steps on new territory, just out of interest? Doesn't experimenting mean that you know that you can fail or that you can have success with your experiments? And that failing doesn't matter because the experiments are most interesting in themselves, so actually there can be no failing because doing the experiment is the success!
So, is an experimenter who wants to "save a lot of unnecessary trouble" an experimenter at all?

73, Stefan
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>