Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | : 3 phase (was LF: G3KEV) |
| From: | "Dr. Wolf Ostwald" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:19:09 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23QsB+NEdkYwnMtX3Kn1KgF6y=OGGkNdP-1=1v3_y6yJqQ@mail.gmail.com> <ABDEA52C3A014557A7C916C4CC9FE552@malPC> <CAA8k23RVqr0VTNYzvLtGPkCzEQFcnXSJoSzV6NvbJoTA5Hieqg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 |
gm reflectees !3 phase AC is far superior to single phase. Motors, transformers and power distribution are more effective and lightweighted using 3 phase . It does not make sense to me that "authorities" e.g. France and England try to get rid of it. Or was that just an assumption? If true, these authorities ought to refresh their physics lessons as well as environmental concerns. Or even better, let people do the job that are in the know ! my two pence worth wolf df2py |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Flex 6300; SWR Plotter, Uwe Wensauer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: More EbNaut 137.777, Andy Talbot |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 3 phase (was LF: G3KEV), John Rabson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: : 3 phase (was LF: G3KEV), John Rabson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |