Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: USB Sound Card?

To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: Re: LF: USB Sound Card?
From: "Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 00:48:35 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <53EE894B.8050502@gmx.net>
References: <CAMFjj73P4GEnkpJjQ1LLHBsY3zpbRSCn+FQBXVKeDye2UerPbA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMFjj71p3xTzFoa_aYrYmYD-=jxAD=VKg2-VHYLovS2iyRPsRg@mail.gmail.com> <53EE5E74.4030405@tiscali.co.uk> <02fc01cfb8c5$542235f0$fc66a1d0$@comcast.net> <53EE894B.8050502@gmx.net>
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Thanks  for the  run down  Tobias

The windows re-sampling caused problems with wspr in the early days on MF , as its possible that wspr had never been used in a situation where 100% of the signal arrived at the RX . qsb was normally part of the process ..
This  caused  a  strange  problem .  where  strong  signals  failed  decode 
, where as  low level  with  qsb  did
It  eventually  transpired , that the  sampling  rates  where  not  quite 
the  same on all  systems  and  the  short  bursts masked  the  timing 
differences ,   tested  by  sample  audio  files  and a  stop-watch
Later  , we  found  Opera / Ros  [ ros was  first]  that  decodes  failed 
with  other  software  running , additional  routines  where  added  to 
ensure the  sample  rate  was  held  at the correct  speed , since then , 
all  has been  ok
I used  soundblaster 5.1  external  usb card , can be  picked  up  s/h now 
on ebay  for  very little
73-G,
G0NBD

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Tobias DG3LV" <DG3LV@gmx.net>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 11:27 PM
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: Re: LF: USB Sound Card?

Hi Jim, Gary !

Experiences with Software Defined Radios ("Softrock" type) over years showed me the highs and lows of using a soundcard as an A/D-converter for HamRadio use. The situation improved from using the onboard-devices to professional external Firewire- or USB-2.0 soundcards as they became available at reasonable prices.
to A) it's true, the windows type drivers support up to 16 Bit only. There 
are some issues to sampling rate stability under windows, too. That's why 
SDR-programs like Winrad, HDSDR etc. use the alternative "ASIO" driver 
model, where 24 Bits are supported natively and where the latency is 
smallest. ASIO drivers typically are bundled with (professional) 
soundcards for studio-recording. I had the usual "EMU-0202-USB" card, 
which was sampling at 192kHz/24 Bit. As this is available no longer, today 
I use an "Icon Cube" and "Icon Cube pro" (2/4 
Channel,192kHz,24Bit,USB-2.0) for my softrock SDR. They are not too 
expensive and do a good job!
to B) Windows has different properties for the hardware sampling rate and 
the offered (simulated) sampling rate. If these are not identical, there 
is a software up/down-resampling done by windows. You have to set the 
correct sampling rate at the hardware-settings (!) of the chosen soundcard 
input/output. (sometimes Win7 resets this to 44.1 kHz/16Bit at another 
booting, so you have to check this first after booting up the PC.)
e.g. Even if the soundcard is just sampling at 48kHz, the windows drivers 
offer 96 and 192 kHz as well, but actual audio-data is still not more than 
48kHz, the rest of the spectrum is filled with "blanks".
to C) Typically the anti-aliasing filters of a soundcard are bound to the 
current (hardware-) sampling rate (=Nyquist) and not be static. Those 
filters are digital ones and part of the A/D converter chips. But the 
datasheets of soundcards shows the filters of the 44.1/48 kHz sampling 
rate only (0-20 kHz), as this is the standard where the "dB-"measurements 
are done.
73 kHz Rx :
In Europe you can receive the DCF77 signals (77.5 kHz) very well by a length of wire (or better a PA0RDT) and directly attaching it to an input of a 192 kHz soundcard. (Here 55dB above noise at 600km distance, software time-decoding by "SoDiRa" SDR-software). It is the same setup as used for SAQ-listening at 17.2 kHz (using HDSDR).
For decoding digimodes (WSPR,JT65,WSQ...) a simple USB-micro-soundcard 
($5) or onboard is ok, the programs just use "mono" and 48kHz at most, 
even the cheapest (for headset use) do well.
73 de dg3lv Tobias

Am 15.08.2014 22:12, schrieb hvanesce@comcast.net:
Gary,

I use a number of expensive and inexpensive external (USB) audio
interfaces, and I like them all (good sensitivity, good dynamic range);
but I experience the following limitations:

A)

I have not been able to persuade Windows and/or Speclab to process 24
bits (I have been successful in applying 24-bit settings in
Windows>ControlPanel>Sound  and Speclab, but have not acquired valid
data after doing so; and accordingly have always used 16-bit settings
with 24-bit external audio interfaces, even though I need at least 24
bits for dynamic range considering VLF and LF environmental noise in
some of my locations)

B)

Similarly to the above, I have been able to set up Windows and Speclab
for 192kHz sample rates, but have not been able to view past 48kHz
without aliasing (and accordingly I settle for 96kHz settings and
interfaces in most cases)

C)

All of my external audio interfaces have steep low-pass filters at or
near 22kHz pole frequency, so SNR is compromised for signals at 20kHz
and above. I’ve disassembled some of these interfaces in attempts to
modify the low-pass filter cutoff frequencies, but without a schematic
could not be certain regarding changes.

Have you seen any of the above issues with internal or external audio
interfaces that you have used?

73,  Jim AA5BW

*From:*owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] *On Behalf Of *Gary - G4WGT
*Sent:* Friday, August 15, 2014 3:25 PM
*To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
*Subject:* Re: LF: USB Sound Card?

Hi Warren,

Yes, I had an internal (on main board) & used it for a while for my
grabber when 73kHz was first allocated to USA.
It was good to about 94kHz.

The SB0490 I suggested is only 96kHz :-((

*73, de Gary - G4WGT*

*                             *

*MF-LF-VLF Grabber :http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/grabber2.html*

*Web :http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/index.html*



.

On 15/08/2014 20:09, Warren Ziegler wrote:

    I guess I should have been more specific .

    What I am seeking is are some sound cards more stable with respect
    to sampling rate and calibration? Also, any advantage to 24bit A/D
      for LF data modes?

      I wonder if anyone has tried 192kHz sample rate for direct
    reception of 73kHz?

    73 & Tnx Warren

    On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Warren Ziegler <wd2xgj@gmail.com
    <mailto:wd2xgj@gmail.com>> wrote:


    I just acquired a Windows Vista tower computer - the price was right
    it was free!

    Seems that there is a problem with the internal sound card, but
    everything else checks out FB.

    I plan on using it with WSPR and other digital modes, am thinking of
    an external USB sound card - will any old sound card do ? Or do I
    need one with a calibrated sampling rate? I suspect that I will need
    something really good for Spectrum Laboratory if I want to sample at
    microHertz rates.

    73 & Tnx Warren K2ORS



    --
    73 Warren K2ORS
                     WD2XGJ
                     WD2XSH/23
                     WE2XEB/2
                     WE2XGR/1





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>