Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: 8969.99

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 02:48:24 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <39966C71EF4543899F81399598C190F7@Extensa> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hello Jim, Bob, VLF,

I assume such a PD inception detector will not work in this setup because there are permanent audible and visible discharges when running the VLF transmitter. Of course all this can be avoided using E field steering elements like a toroid out of aluminium tube, like that one http://www.grosshandel-knajp.de/images/img/fck/rohr_gl.jpg I've used some of these tubes for 200 kV stuff at work some years ago. Maybe an idea for Bob! They are available with a diameter of say 6 cm? Not expensive and light weight! Hide the end of the antenna wire into the center of such a toroid, maybe having 20 cm diameter and the arcing problems will be gone!
Anyway i think that it will be to late if you stop transmitting after detecting PD coming from a beginning insulation breakdown of the enamelled cu wire. Eventual raindrops falling between the turns will deform the E field dramatically and cause high local field strength, that's my fear.

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 27.12.2013 08:42, schrieb hvanesce:

Stefan,

 

If arc-induced breakdown paths between turns is an issue, have you considered adding a homebrew corona inception detector with feedback to the modulator or switch driver? I haven’t made one for a VLF coil, but it might be worth a try if repairs are an issue; there is good precedent at near-VLF frequencies.

 

The idea would be to limit voltage or skip cycles before breakdown occurs; the voltage-limiting method could often be nearly transparent to real-time operation.

 

If repairs are rare then the above might not be worth it, just thought I’d mention the possibility.

 

73, Jim AA5BW  

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stefan Schäfer
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 10:33 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99

 

Hi Bob,

Of course, if the coil is protected against rain, then it is no problem. But the coil is quite large and due to the high voltage, the housing should ideally have a distance of 30cm or more to the coil. So the housing must be quite large, even more. And that makes it dangerous because of wind blasts on the to of the building in 35m AGL...
Anyway it would be nice and i also thought about using a simple foil across the coil, without additional distance.
However on LF, there are partial discharges on the top of the coil which burns holes into the protecting foil. And the VLF winding is 2000m long. It is a lot of effort to repair it after a short cut between some turns due to arcing. So it is a high risk.
I think i will make a test in the near future and see if 9 kHz partial discharges are as agressive as 137 kHz partial discharges :-)
73, Stefan/DK7FC


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>