Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: VLF: 8969.99

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: VLF: 8969.99
From: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 15:14:36 -0700
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass (test mode) [email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1388096100; bh=tctoRa3433nTby2SwND0aMIjaGat6wooHpL9lRxBihY=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=EkWXcCyvOiHh8+Mug2YtA4QO7wwYz0Lc3ckOOMX2FtsCRJQ81KRFLpOSobmiFzhsA vfsjsCLWrLeXxO3tPXRbTrhAd1nNZYbJ6KlHhrX6ud4YIPudwCvRUTEUXwiNmAh19N WpidgyPVD0zHuf+t8oLwopcbXf9XJXeE9EYFktUJ7g2oj2+pL9jMqYJRgqf6tH9HOf m8fbSnKlWYhnA5FGySE1YQ0PJzwaEigDXqOVNPFBGNcAV3mHnAIdPX5XeKWHHwKD5A 3nlFLVQu6nB7OjgkZxXLeZpCbqsiZbD8qqCTo7ZEexCsL0DFa/7B1/fpyoFHbUMIND RJ7lBqEKBGraA==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <39966C71EF4543899F81399598C190F7@Extensa> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: AQF4gPz2ZsKVrt05Wvg22cCZ2bAEHQIVWltfAe40wD4CAiw8mQCLmYQeAIqD1XoCL62U6gLbUZ6UAddNmCWapBS1YA==

Bob and Stefan,

 

Any thought of using Fluorinert to prevent coil breakdown?

 

In indoor applications, if we didn’t want a high-voltage (including 100kV and higher) coil (or transformer or connector or circuit board) to arc (including during wide-temperature range testing), we would simply drop the whole device (including batteries, power supply and modulator, if that made things more convenient) into fluorinert, without any insulation, encapsulation or coating on the circuit boards, coil or other components. We re-used the fluorinert without complications, and after removing items from fluorinert did not need to clean the previously-immersed items in any way.

 

High dielectric strength: >160kV/cm

High resistivity: > 10^15 ohm-cm  (1E15 ohm-cm)

Inert

Wide temperature range: -70C < T < 150C (various formulations available down to -100C and up to 215C)

Thermal conductivity: 0.07 W/m*K (ROM similar to water)

Color: colorless, clear (transparency ROM same as purified water)

Toxicity: non-toxic for practical purposes, non-hazardous according to 3M. Experimental deep-water breathing fluid; inert; but as with all products observe safety data sheet (3M: “… not recommended for implantation in humans” “… Eye Contact: … flush, rinse”); the following lends a perspective: (3M) “…skin/eye irritation: no significant irritation”;  “if swallowed: no need for first aid is anticipated”.

 

Downside: ~ $200 USD per gallon from manufacturer; but reclaimed fluorinert is available at lower prices.

The evaporation rate is probably dependent on which formulation you select; I’ve heard some folks mention quick evaporation at > 100C temperatures, but I do not remember needing to add fluorinert during environmental temperature testing; a wide range of formulations with different boiling points is available.

 

73, Jim AA5BW

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob Raide
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 12:05 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: VLF: 8969.99

 

Stefan;
I understand your setup.  It is not that hard to move.
I am not going to use such low VLF freq but as I mentioned am going for license to try get 28-30 kHz.  Then I can run power up with less troubles of 8.9 kHz freq.  It won't be till next season but am planning now for coil cover-coil size-etc.  I have already 2' piece 18 inch white PVC pipe.  Will wind 1000 meters #16 wire to start.  I want to use my present 74 kHz coil inside as it is and add the extra coil outside then I can trim inside to hit exact resonance.
 


Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 19:44:09 +0100
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99

Hi Bob,

Oh, you're planning to become QRV on VLF, great!
What inductance will you need for your system? What coil diameter and wire diameter will you use? It is important to calculate the dimension of that coil before you start to wind it. A diameter of at least 60cm is to be recommended, better 80cm. But of course it depends on the wire diameter and isolation (or insulation?). If you just use a coil body that is on hand and start winding, you may find the residual L is much to low and then you come out with 3 coils in series which will be a huge construction in very inefficient. You should also leave some distance to ground, to prevent losses into the soil. A distance equal to the coil diameter is fine.
How will you manage the high voltages on the antenna? You will have to manage 50 kV rms or so.

For me, the situation is not as easy. I must not leave the coil its position permanenty. I have to remove it after the experiment. But that's not so dramatic. I can leave it into the building and we have an elevator...
Keep us informed by some photos :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 26.12.2013 18:58, schrieb Bob Raide:

Stefan;
If I go to VLF I am going to add to my existing inductance outside.  I plan to make a box using "plexiglass" quarter inch thick with glued seams so is weather proof.  It will be clear [no color] and is very good dielectric.  I was going to ask you how much clearance I need and 30 cm is about 1 foot or 12 inches clearance around the coil.  Leave air gap around bottom so air can circulate so you don't build up moisture.  Small muffin fan with shroud to pull fresh air up and around coil and out.
Could even use clear vinyl material .025 thick and a clear vinyl box over a plastic pipe frame would be cheaper.  Clear vinyl used for side curtains on boats-etc.
I am in sewing business [make boat and truck covers] so could make you cover and you build the frame-I ship clear vinyl cover UPS to you or you could have local canvas company make it.  Use "RTV" over stitches to make water tight-Bob
 


Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 18:32:43 +0100
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99

Hi Bob,

Of course, if the coil is protected against rain, then it is no problem. But the coil is quite large and due to the high voltage, the housing should ideally have a distance of 30cm or more to the coil. So the housing must be quite large, even more. And that makes it dangerous because of wind blasts on the to of the building in 35m AGL...
Anyway it would be nice and i also thought about using a simple foil across the coil, without additional distance.
However on LF, there are partial discharges on the top of the coil which burns holes into the protecting foil. And the VLF winding is 2000m long. It is a lot of effort to repair it after a short cut between some turns due to arcing. So it is a high risk.
I think i will make a test in the near future and see if 9 kHz partial discharges are as agressive as 137 kHz partial discharges :-)
73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 26.12.2013 16:32, schrieb Bob Raide:

Stefan;
Even if you have your coils in weather proof housing rain is no good to transmit on 9 kHz? Bob
 


Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 13:55:11 +0100
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99

Hi Uwe, Tom, VLF,

Best signal ever from Tom, capture attached. Is it due to the propagation or did it improve your signal?
What about some tests in OPDS32 or maybe JT9-30? Unfortunately there is permanent rain here so i have to wait some days longer.

73, Stefan/DK7FC

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>