Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: VLF: 8969.99

from [Stefan Schäfer] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 13:55:11 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <39966C71EF4543899F81399598C190F7@Extensa> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hi Uwe, Tom, VLF,

Best signal ever from Tom, capture attached. Is it due to the propagation or did it improve your signal?
What about some tests in OPDS32 or maybe JT9-30? Unfortunately there is permanent rain here so i have to wait some days longer.

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 26.12.2013 10:58, schrieb g3zjo:
Hi All

Yes, yesterday was quieter on 8.9KHz with less catastrophic noise pulses. This meant that although Uwe's signal was less strong than during other tests I was in the catchment area. The low signal level means there are breaks in the line here in both 424uH and 47uHz FFT but I was able to catch some nice periods when the signal in 47uHz was10dB above the noise peaks. I can categorically confirm reception.

Thanks Uwe and (Tom DL8CAT) for the signal.

73 Eddie G3ZJO
http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm

Attachment: 6000.jpg
Description: JPEG image

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: VLF: 8969.99, g3zjo
Next by Date:  RE: VLF: 8969.99, Bob Raide
Previous by Thread:  Re: VLF: 8969.99, g3zjo
Next by Thread:  RE: VLF: 8969.99, Bob Raide
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]