To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna |
From: | "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 05 Jul 2013 19:47:33 +0200 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <005b01ce798a$b0476600$6d01a8c0@DELL4> |
References: | <CAKvcm2dpuftdtK6OdQv8fOfiw+4yQrPBQBHJ-FN2gDbT4P_oMQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <op.wzq2tgvnyzqh0k@pc-roelof> <005b01ce798a$b0476600$6d01a8c0@DELL4> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Opera Mail/12.15 (Win32) |
Hello Jay, I don't think so.I have carried out a test with a vertical feed line and a horizontal feed line on a pole pushed out an upstairs windows. In both cases the antenna was in the same position and showed equal signal levels from the groundwave of ONO-399.5 at 59 km. 73, Roelof, pa0rdt |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Wellbrook RX loops, pat |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna, Graham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna, jrusgrove |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna, Graham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |