Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna |
| From: | "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sat, 06 Jul 2013 20:37:57 +0200 |
| Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
| Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
| In-reply-to: | <8C9E7EDCA83145B4B00E1D951DC401B1@Clemens0811> |
| References: | <CAKvcm2dpuftdtK6OdQv8fOfiw+4yQrPBQBHJ-FN2gDbT4P_oMQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <op.wzq2tgvnyzqh0k@pc-roelof> <005b01ce798a$b0476600$6d01a8c0@DELL4> <op.wzrfpjyyyzqh0k@pc-roelof> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <8C9E7EDCA83145B4B00E1D951DC401B1@Clemens0811> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Opera Mail/12.15 (Win32) |
Hello Clemens, This is what I tried last weekend.It does not work as a dipole as you have two verticals, which were in my case two meter apart. 73, Roelof, pa0rdt |
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna, Roelof Bakker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna, edgar |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna, Clemens Paul |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna, edgar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |