Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 10:19:40 -0400
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass (test mode) [email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1373033981; bh=tTNM5JGip6Cy8/zS+DcdmAO4IuQaM55tozl8Pmc++1E=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=Y6nT2CvAKXoGl1mBGmtEHLjnuUuo8xd04y/jbhES9cQho9qy65BA5slRD08VbTKks DBq8yZas92pWMMU79zqMhNUJZDNACWJyRJaK5dXEjrmTFXkEe/VQPv4BAJT1FLzRfQ pP4BAJZGyIXqt+SdMhIFMqgGiZUWqFCQSJfaf7BKNJtzCCp4hku+77dr6eoQlPvx+Z xxXkv154Pqbl0v8GyVek1soBBZOkU1nu75p2BwyO2KFdq4FE4HhwpNu2p8Xzg2UaIl BFtcXSTRZyvTGgkRx4SsZRCRL1s4asqXV33NDIlpHBud4Gu8gCtEUaf4GMyfjmMmF+ ObsudBdFxQaOA==
References: <CAKvcm2dpuftdtK6OdQv8fOfiw+4yQrPBQBHJ-FN2gDbT4P_oMQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <op.wzq2tgvnyzqh0k@pc-roelof>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Roelof

Without adequate isolation between the feedline and e probe unit itself, the x meters of vertical feedline above ground level is part of the antenna.

Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2


----- Original Message ----- From: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna


Hello all,

Further to this discussion, I have done the ultimate test to demonstrate that an active whip antenna with a 1 meter long whip behaves as a capacitance at LF.

For the test I used the ground wave carrier of semi local NDB ONO at 399.5  kHz.
As it is the only station at that frequency the carrier level is very  stable 
at daytime.
The distance is 59 km, which excludes probably all skywave propagation.

The antenna was mounted vertical and the carrier of ONO produced a signal level of -69.1 dBm as received with a PERSEUS SDR.

Next the antenna was mounted horizontal at the same height as the bottom  of 
the vertical mount.
This produce a signal level of -72.0 dBm.

I reasoned that the mean height of the 1 meter long antenna when mounted vertical is 50 cm higher. So the antenna was then mounted horizontal 50 cm higher from its previous position. This produced a signal level of -69.9 dBm, close to the value measured when mounted vertical.

The main point however, is that a horizontal polarized antenna should NOT receive a vertical polarized ground wave signal at (almost) the same strength.

So at LF, there is nothing gained in using a whip instead of a small piece  of 
copper clad PCB.

Comments are much appreciated!

Best regards,
Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>