To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna |
From: | "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 05 Jul 2013 16:14:14 +0200 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <D65E0161C6064ED3BE2C98DE4709F6E4@AGB> |
References: | <CAKvcm2dpuftdtK6OdQv8fOfiw+4yQrPBQBHJ-FN2gDbT4P_oMQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <op.wzq2tgvnyzqh0k@pc-roelof> <D65E0161C6064ED3BE2C98DE4709F6E4@AGB> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Opera Mail/12.15 (Win32) |
Hello Graham, This will work as well. I have build one in a small die cast aluminum box. The box was the "antenna" and the buffer amplifier was inside the box. The feed line was connected via an isolated BNC connector.I believe the form that approached a ball the most, was a unit where the electronics were mounted on a BNC connector and the "antenna"consisting of copper foil wrapped around it. It fitted inside a half 35 mm film cannister. 73, Roelof, pa0rdt |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna, Roelof Bakker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna, Graham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna, Graham |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna, jrusgrove |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |