To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: NOV 472 |
From: | John Pumford-Green <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:59:10 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fIAdKQZlRrVoI9PyK6SCAiLLNbU7oY0hFK1jfeLyN50=; b=qX4DpJisakzHOmhTzq4GbN8eVRoLqPGZqAw2TtAp6mvKrdt+R7mWXbJwMEBK/PU21W anIB5dyCZ1nTsbu3VlKb9IkOVQCqH69YPvIk4U2239AEjeY+oGTU4a1pFjCuIQf/9c4L foeZm6RK8tbG/smN+nLOzDYSxPjJLejKsAJfyjRgpfcsQYTytMXmOCK3rOQMN6PHaEjr L4ixrzHf6GM4yHBIcpLlELTqD2c2Id49KKPaKMiCHTLcTF90cHVzUGFm7HhmyBqS8XJt 3ZC80MOGrtsFf7ZuIeSc84FBmaMnbknfli4BNSllcKPJ4e2Df6Uq9gfuzuCUk4JJNohZ 369g== |
In-reply-to: | <CAO19VgOYcDcxb2qOUQHST0PkhrL2R_bW+wfG_KsDzGv8QQ5F0Q@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <001e01cddea6$9598aa00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <003401cddea9$2d337a00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <CAO19VgOYcDcxb2qOUQHST0PkhrL2R_bW+wfG_KsDzGv8QQ5F0Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 |
On 20/12/2012 12:51, DAVE PICK wrote: Important note Please note that the 5MHz and 472-479kHz NoVs can be applied for at any time but do not come into effect until 1 January 2013. Copied from the RSGB NOV page... What counts in legal terms though - a notice on the RSGB's website or the actual document bearing OFCOM's "stamp"? I'd say the Notice of Variation itself is what determines what is allowed.I'd also say that the person who knocked up the web application service made an error and the "Valid From" date should have been set, in the software that processes the applications, to be : "January 1st 2013 or date of application, whichever is the latest".Nonetheless, the legal document called a Notice of Variation is quite clear, and nowhere in the W/T act does it say you must take notice of a few lines of text on the RSGB's website. John GM4SLV |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: NOV 472, Roger Lapthorn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: LF NoV, Ken |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: NOV 472, mal hamilton |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: NOV 472, mal hamilton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |