I agree with this. Why would this NOV be different from all others issued.
The date on the NOV has always been the effective date to commence operating
and cease operating.
I have several issued over the years for other bands.
I suggest we let sleeping dogs lay and not make an issue out of this. If
some feel unhappy then do not do it.
de mal/g3kev
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Pumford-Green" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: LF: NOV 472
> On 20/12/2012 12:51, DAVE PICK wrote:
> > Important note
> >
> > Please note that the 5MHz and 472-479kHz NoVs can be applied for at any
> > time but do not come into effect until 1 January 2013.
> >
> >
> > Copied from the RSGB NOV page...
> >
>
>
> What counts in legal terms though - a notice on the RSGB's website or
> the actual document bearing OFCOM's "stamp"?
>
> I'd say the Notice of Variation itself is what determines what is allowed.
>
> I'd also say that the person who knocked up the web application service
> made an error and the "Valid From" date should have been set, in the
> software that processes the applications, to be :
>
> "January 1st 2013 or date of application, whichever is the latest".
>
> Nonetheless, the legal document called a Notice of Variation is quite
> clear, and nowhere in the W/T act does it say you must take notice of a
> few lines of text on the RSGB's website.
>
> John
> GM4SLV
>
> >>
> >
>
>
|
