Yes, if the 20th is stated, then just use it from now on. No one will
care or even complain. And no one seriously expects trouble.
472.5 is not a good frequency. There is a permanent QRM signal there,
observed/confirmed by several stations (such as DL4YHF). Thus we prefer
472.2 or 472.8 in recent times. However some stations still stick to
472.5, which is not a good choice.
Last night i added a variometer part for the MF coil. This covers
449...482kHz now, which is suboptimal. Let me spend some time to
optimise the adjustable range.
CUL, Stefan
Am 20.12.2012 12:57, schrieb mal hamilton:
Stefan
as far as I am concerned it is effective from
now.
Check 472.5 Khz now
de mal/g3kev
|
|
