Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: RE: Full ID

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: RE: Full ID
From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:18:40 +0100
Accept-language: nl-NL, nl-BE
Acceptlanguage: nl-NL, nl-BE
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: Acuh6IOI/bvmqtAFS8yXpMBMj5uq3wAC2G90
Thread-topic: Full ID
Mike,

I am in favour of "full suffix" ;-)

73, Rik  OR7T

________________________________________
Van: [email protected] [[email protected]] 
namens Mike Dennison [[email protected]]
Verzonden: woensdag 22 december 2010 15:54
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: LF: Full ID

Markus,

Your suffix is only 18 minutes long but my suffix would take
more than twice as long - 38 minutes - to send at QRSS60.
The 'X' is 14 minutes on its own. So the situation is not
the same for everyone. Many people are using QRSS120 or even
QRSS240 where the problem is even worse.

I try to reduce local QRM and also transmitter and inductor
heating by keeping the duty cycle down - which is also why I
only send once per half hour. I also send a complete CW
ident for those within audible range.

Most DXers on 137 know what the abbreviated calls mean or
can ask on this group.

Mike, G3XDV (X)
============



> Dear DX beacon operators,
>
> how about sending complete suffixes? These could be
> detected just as likely, without the guesswork...
>
> Best 73, Markus ("NM")
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
> Von: [email protected]
> An: [email protected]
> Verschickt: Mi., 22. Dez. 2010, 11:04
> Thema: Re: LF: RU6LA 22-12.jpg
>
>
>
> Sorry Henny but L = F4DTL
>
> 73 de F4DTL Nicolas
>
>
> Dans un e-mail daté du 22/12/2010 10:55:30 Paris, Madrid,
> [email protected] a écrit :
>
> Gm Ed,LF
> Capture RU6LA
> Henny pa3cpm
> 73's
> Het bericht kan nu met het volgende bijlagen of
> koppelingen worden verzonden: RU6LA 22-12.jpg
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>