To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ |
From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:12:25 -0000 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=6m+DFbg9Xj1WktQCujlqL2MI4GlBpzcuAXOOeZSTihm8Fqkm/4HlS5U7DCYZ7HjItgWmJFCUITgVAAwVkDSunX6PprGFtRXGdG8xwF6ImAk+AoXegVIFhBv0y0+5mTzhRWaYyNN+uOZuQZSD6VxhlrxOYn3dScvlUeDYOPiObMI= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <CA9B4756F6FE486A9EC72A6BFEA82E90@JimPC> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Dear Paul-Henrick, LF Group,Not yet - I think it would need about 10 more dB to make your sigs audible at the moment. 0.3Hz bandwidth is OK for QRSS, but not for normal speed CW! Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul-Henrik" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:57 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ Hello Jim, LF Thanks for the update and information. I have one question on your comments: of noise in the middle is where I switched to the E-W loop for a while. I am getting pretty consistent 10 - 15dB SNR in 0.3Hz bandwidth with the N-S loop Are you saying you can/could actually copy my CW-ident by ear? That would open yet another dimesion. So far I know my CW has only been copied by ear within a 300km radius. |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: QRG & MSG UPDATE: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ, mal hamilton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: WSPR does not work, Markus Vester |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ, Paul-Henrik |
Next by Thread: | LF: MSG UPDATE: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ now in QRSS3, Paul-Henrik |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |