Hello Dave, LF
Thanks for reporting!
Yes, that looks like me sending a longer CW ID followed by "TT" in QRSS3. Is
136.35kHz less suited at your QTH due to the local QRM? I can move back up to
136.40kHz for a while if you think that helps.
73's
Paul-Henrik
Quoting Dave G3WCB <[email protected]>:
> Paul-Henrik, LF,
>
> I was definitely seeing traces of your signal around 1900 utc before you
> QSYd. See attached screengrab.
>
> No sign ot the QRSS3 on 136.35, yet.
>
> 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Paul-Henrik
> Sent: 16 January 2009 20:47
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: LF: Re: QRG & MSG UPDATE: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ
>
>
> Danke Markus!
>
> I'm so positively surprised and if I had a bottle of Champagne it would be
> open
> now. These are very encouraging reports. Perhaps time to start building a
> more
> powerful transmitter now. The antenna is about as good as it gets on this
> property. An elevated loading coil could be worth a try though as the
> vertical
> wire is very near one of the supporting trees and I suspect some of that
> highly
> needed ERP is wasted in it.
>
> Will keep the signal coming for a few more hours, the PSU seems to do the
> job
> (PSU for my old retired Yaesu FT-250).
>
> 73's
>
> Paul-Henrik
>
> Quoting Markus Vester <[email protected]>:
>
> > ... this it what it looked like here at 20:18. Nice job with 20 mW!
> >
> > 73 - Markus, DF6NM in JN59NK
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:18 PM
> > Subject: LF: Re: QRG & MSG UPDATE: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ
> >
> >
> > Dear Paul-Henrik, LF Group,
> >
> > Now building up to "O" copy...
> >
> > Cheers, Jim Moritz
> > 73 de M0BMU
> >
>
>
>
>
|
