Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ
From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:43:53 -0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=JZZjH0D+yVKXQTNvu6101Mi7b8wv7e0BZ9r+qijMH6+5mx98UJIsdL2ct62gab3EVTMMGZZ70QOgS2RYJOfIgd26LvYlxUKwBK7dsXa68JTIFsf4hf0tOTrjrjlG0eAJw4XR5P/uTwH9N3gZXyW5bEpgkOl6HLdBbXwd7Z7Ocxo= ;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Dear Dave, Paul-Henrik,

It could well be due to the increasing level of sidebands from Lakihegy, and associated Luxembourg effect noises. The attachment shows OH1LSQ mostly received on a N-S oriented loop which nulls Lakihegy quite well. The burst of noise in the middle is where I switched to the E-W loop for a while. I am getting pretty consistent 10 - 15dB SNR in 0.3Hz bandwidth with the N-S loop

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU

----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave G3WCB" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:12 PM
Subject: RE: LF: Re: QRG & MSG UPDATE: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ


Paul-Henrik, LF,

136.35 kHz is fine for me, it's probably just that the conditions may have
changed. I'll continue to monitor 136.35 for the next few hours.

73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM



Attachment: OH1LSQ_4.jpg
Description: JPEG image

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>