To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ |
From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:43:53 -0000 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=JZZjH0D+yVKXQTNvu6101Mi7b8wv7e0BZ9r+qijMH6+5mx98UJIsdL2ct62gab3EVTMMGZZ70QOgS2RYJOfIgd26LvYlxUKwBK7dsXa68JTIFsf4hf0tOTrjrjlG0eAJw4XR5P/uTwH9N3gZXyW5bEpgkOl6HLdBbXwd7Z7Ocxo= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Dear Dave, Paul-Henrik,It could well be due to the increasing level of sidebands from Lakihegy, and associated Luxembourg effect noises. The attachment shows OH1LSQ mostly received on a N-S oriented loop which nulls Lakihegy quite well. The burst of noise in the middle is where I switched to the E-W loop for a while. I am getting pretty consistent 10 - 15dB SNR in 0.3Hz bandwidth with the N-S loop Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave G3WCB" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:12 PM Subject: RE: LF: Re: QRG & MSG UPDATE: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ Paul-Henrik, LF, 136.35 kHz is fine for me, it's probably just that the conditions may have changed. I'll continue to monitor 136.35 for the next few hours. 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM
OH1LSQ_4.jpg |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: QRG & MSG UPDATE: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ, Paul-Henrik |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ, Paul-Henrik |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: Re: QRG & MSG UPDATE: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ, Dave G3WCB |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ, Paul-Henrik |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |