To: | "rsgb_lf_group" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: USA 136kHz proposals |
From: | "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 16 May 2002 11:28:00 +0100 |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
I see from yesterday's ARRL Letter that the proposal for the USA 136 band is for 1W ERP and bandwidth less than 100Hz. I am puzzled why they are putting this stipulation on bandwidth, which I do not believe anybody else has done. It could be a disincentive for normal CW operation (although hopefully most CW will be in this bandwidth), and presumably will be difficult to enforce. 73s Dave G3YMC [email protected] [email protected] http://www.dsergeant.btinternet.co.uk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: RE: Litz wire, john sexton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: RE: RE: litz wire, James Moritz |
Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: RE: litz wire, Ashlock,William |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: USA 136kHz proposals, James Moritz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |