Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | "rsgb_lf_group" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: USA 136kHz proposals |
| From: | "Dave Sergeant" <dsergeant@connectfree.co.uk> |
| Date: | Thu, 16 May 2002 11:28:00 +0100 |
| Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
| Sender: | <majordom@post.thorcom.com> |
I see from yesterday's ARRL Letter that the proposal for the USA 136 band is for 1W ERP and bandwidth less than 100Hz. I am puzzled why they are putting this stipulation on bandwidth, which I do not believe anybody else has done. It could be a disincentive for normal CW operation (although hopefully most CW will be in this bandwidth), and presumably will be difficult to enforce. 73s Dave G3YMC dsergeant@iee.org dsergeant@btinternet.com http://www.dsergeant.btinternet.co.uk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: RE: Litz wire, john sexton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: RE: RE: litz wire, James Moritz |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: RE: litz wire, Ashlock,William |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: USA 136kHz proposals, James Moritz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |