Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: USA 136kHz proposals |
| From: | "Alberto di Bene" <dibene@usa.net> |
| Date: | Sun, 19 May 2002 13:00:34 +0200 |
| References: | <5.1.0.14.0.20020516141438.00a7dd28@gemini.herts.ac.uk> <002501c1fd03$6ce28bc0$1ee8fc3e@l8p8y6> |
| Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
| Sender: | <majordom@post.thorcom.com> |
hamilton mal wrote: We need a plan for QRS as I suggested before and above and normal CW operations. These will be the most popular modes and have worked well so far. Other modes FSK/BPSK/JASON etc that take up more b/width will have to be kept separate to avoid qrm and frequency swamping. More bandwidth ? JASON takes slightly more than 4 Hz, which cannot be said for 'normal' CW. 73 Alberto I2PHD |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: US FCC NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING, Comments, 'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: US FCC NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING, Comments, Andre Kesteloot |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: USA 136kHz proposals, James Moritz |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: USA 136kHz proposals, Dave Sergeant |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |