LF: Re: USA 136kHz proposals

["Alberto di Bene" <dibene@usa.net>]

hamilton mal wrote:

> We need a plan for QRS as I suggested before and above and normal CW
> operations. These will be the most popular modes and have worked well so
> far. Other modes FSK/BPSK/JASON etc that take up more b/width will have to
> be kept separate to avoid qrm and frequency swamping.
More bandwidth ? JASON takes slightly more than 4 Hz, which cannot be said
for 'normal' CW.

73  Alberto  I2PHD