Re: LF: This and that

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: This and that
From:	"Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>
Date:	Sat, 27 Jan 2001 20:34:25 +0100
Organization:	Undisclosed
References:	<[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>

Steve Rawlings wrote:

[snip]
I agree.  But, if QRSS is such an ideal mode, why do QRSS
operators need to use the whole of our tiny 2.1 kHz allocation to
do it?
[snip]


A QRSS signal takes less than 1 Hz of band.
Any greater 'apparent' band occupancy is to blame on the receiver.

73   Alberto   I2PHD

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: This and that, Steve Rawlings LF: Re: This and that, Steve Olney LF: Re: Re: This and that, Dave Sergeant LF: Re: Re: Re: This and that, Steve Olney Re: LF: Re: This and that, Steve Rawlings Re: LF: This and that, Brian Rogerson LF: Re: Brian we need you, g3ldo Re: LF: This and that, Alberto di Bene <= Re: LF: This and that, Steve Rawlings Re: LF: This and that, g3ldo Re: LF: This and that, Steve Rawlings Re: LF: This and that, g3ldo LF: Re: This and that, Alberto di Bene LF: Earthing, Martin M5CIX LF: Re: Earthing, John Rabson LF: Re: Re: Earthing - correction, John Rabson LF: RE: Re: Re: Earthing - correction, Martin LF: Re: RE: Re: Re: Earthing - correction, John Rabson

Previous by Date:	LF: Re: re: LF tests, g3ldo
Next by Date:	LF: Re: 73Khz tests, mike.dennison
Previous by Thread:	LF: Re: Brian we need you, g3ldo
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: This and that, Steve Rawlings
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]