Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 4134 ]

Total 4134 documents matching your query.

61. Re: LF: RE: Re: PF per Meter dependant on wire size? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:35:07 +0200
Dear Paul, I have an idea. Take a photo of tower and the place where the coil will be placed and add some red lines (e.g. with MS Paint) to illustrate the wires. Then we can add some lines how we wou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00036.html (12,773 bytes)

62. Re: VLF: more RX stns needed (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:17:28 +0100
OK, Jean-Louis, Michael, Horst, Very nice!! I will inform you when the next experiment starts. This is always rather spontanic, just like the wind is available :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 18.03.2010 16:5
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00064.html (11,168 bytes)

63. Re: LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:50:07 +0200
Hi Johan, You are right but first i think (and hope) there will come up other TX stations. Otherwise it would make no sense to discuss whats necessary for a 2 way QSO ;-) And 137kHz also started with
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00088.html (12,710 bytes)

64. Re: LF: Please verify capture: DK7FC's 3rd VLF transmission (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:55:33 +0100
Am 23.03.2010 11:12, schrieb Horst Stöcker: I sent the capture befor, but to be sure, once again. Could someone verify that it was Stefans signal. If yes it could be something for the log, if not tak
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00106.html (12,306 bytes)

65. Re: LF: VLF (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:37:32 +0100
Why a ballon? If you want to keep it reasonably stable in the sky you need a LOT of helium and a BIG ballon. And i assume nobody wants to use hydrogen instead of helium when operating with some 10kV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00264.html (10,484 bytes)

66. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:48:49 +0100
Thank you for your report Paul. It reads very scientific if compared to my report, hi ;-) I'll keep rather writing as a fascinated dreamer who wants to share the euphoria with the others. But you do
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00309.html (12,998 bytes)

67. Re: LF: Re: 9kHz noise level (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:28:39 +0100
Am 03.03.2010 12:50, schrieb Paul Nicholson: Yes, given a low Z source - no good for E-field rx. On the input of the E-field antenna i use a JFET (BF862), then a narrow band pass filter and after tha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00325.html (10,706 bytes)

68. LF: VLF WEB SDR (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:35:08 +0100
The web sdr at http://websdr.pa3weg.nl/ does not show the alpha beacons, almost not. Why? Others explained that they can receive them with 20dB SNR? Stefan/DK7FC
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00340.html (10,522 bytes)

69. Re: LF: TX- Loop for 136kHz (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:26:02 +0100
But Uwe, With a 100m Vertical you reach 1W ERP with 20W TX power! So 1,2kW will be 60W ERP on 137kHz ;-) If you think about the ratio between achieved signal to the effort you have, this may be an al
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00375.html (9,134 bytes)

70. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:38:13 +0100
Am 16.03.2010 14:08, schrieb Paul Nicholson: Thanks, that was a good field trip in the best amateur radio tradition. Ironic how we are at the same time using the most hi-tech, but also the simple bat
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00409.html (16,063 bytes)

71. Re: LF: 9kHz: soundcard RX (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:15:38 +0100
Hello Horst, This is the soundcard: http://shop.zeg-shop.de/shop/index.asp?id=120340&sid=2670421779 It costs 8,99 Euro ;-) It is nothing special but the advantage is that it is not installed in my no
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00431.html (10,112 bytes)

72. Re: LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:00:10 +0200
The next important step is to convince DF6NM (and others) to buy such a kite! ;-) 73, Stefan Am 30.03.2010 10:50, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: Hi Johan, You are right but first i think (and hope) there wi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00487.html (13,162 bytes)

73. Re: LF: Re: DK7FC's 3rd VLF transmission (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:18:27 +0100
Very nice! 0,8m*0,8m is really practicable and easy to built for everyone. Not expensive too... And our distance is 655km, well above the garden ;-) I do not even see a too big difference in S/N comp
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00546.html (16,367 bytes)

74. Re: Congrats: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:29:12 +0100
Tnx for all of your congrats! :-) This is a screenshot of DF8ZR/Bernd's reception in QRSS30 mode in a distance of 16km. DK7FC/P The RXers side is most important. A well optimised receiver, such as Pa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00661.html (12,944 bytes)

75. Re: LF: Re: AW: 9kHz loop/preamp for soundcard receiver (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:42:38 +0100
Dear Jim, group, OK so far. And what do you think will be the most suitable TX antenna type? The standard marconi as i will try it, with all its disadvantages (high coil and earth losses, high voltag
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00716.html (12,658 bytes)

76. Re: LF: vlf stuff (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:03:12 +0200
Hi Laurence, Fine! Do you wish to receive an amateur radio signal there down once time? Take a look on my dreamers band grabber (http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html).
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00010.html (11,125 bytes)

77. Re: VLF: 8,97kHz / dreamers band grabber, another one... (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:25:58 +0200
... i have added the ALPHA line on 11904,762 now to the grabber... 73, Stefan/DK7FC
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00020.html (11,449 bytes)

78. Re: LF: Dreamers Band update from W1VLF (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:53:10 +0200
Hi Paul, VLF, Am 17.04.2010 17:58, schrieb Paul A. Cianciolo: I wonder if you can point me to the schematic of your final amplifier? It would be nice to learn from amplifier building experience. Yes,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00103.html (12,928 bytes)

79. Re: VLF: 8,97 kHz active antenna circuit and pictures (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:23:50 +0200
Hello Horst, Sorry, for the bugs. The 2nd JFET is also a BF862, yes. RG174 is just an example, you can use any coaxial cable or maybe twisted pair cable. "This evening" should have been "This weekend
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00196.html (12,959 bytes)

80. Re: LF: RE: RE: RE: W1VLF 9 Khz Antenna update Putting inductance near the top. (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:03:17 +0200
Hi Rik, Yes, sure ;-) But i worry, that someone elso than me has to try this since it will rather be problematic to place my water barrel 70m up on the kite, HI. I am sure the effect/improvement will
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00199.html (14,295 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu