Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 271 ]

Total 271 documents matching your query.

241. LF: AW: Antenna wire (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:36:05 +0200
Tony, If it doesn't matter about the weight of that cable, RG58 is not a too bad idea if there is a need to handle very high voltages. But since you told us you will have a very long wire your antenn
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00267.html (11,010 bytes)

242. LF: AW: HV-Transformer experiment on 9kc (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:03:53 +0200
Wolf, Ask DD7PC for a TV transformer, not a 50 Hz HV transformer! Marco has already ordered one from http://www.oppermann-electronic.de/html/teslatechnik.html (Tesla82)... ...as mentioned before... G
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00281.html (11,256 bytes)

243. VLF: ufb conds right now (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 10:37:30 +0200
VLF, Just in the moment, the QRN/QRM is absolutely low! Excellent conds for a VLF experiemnt! But it will be like that just for a few hours in the morning and it is not sure how it will be tomorrow.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00290.html (9,174 bytes)

244. LF: AW: Re: AW: DLVLF qrv again (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:59:25 +0200
Mal, Impossible! ...unless Wolf runs not at least 10 MW! It makes no sense to watch the QRG faster than QRSS-600, belive me! Stefan ________________________________ Von: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blackshee
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00324.html (15,193 bytes)

245. VLF: Strong drifting carrier on VLF! (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:14:19 +0200
Dear group, Currently there is a very strong (abt 30 dB S/N) drifting carrier that started about 7:30 UTC on abt 12 kHz and is moving now up on 14 kHz. First i thought that it is a local signal but n
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00388.html (13,024 bytes)

246. LF: AW: testsig de DLVLF 8970 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:19:40 +0200
Wolf, What is the voltage you are achieving now? Yes, increasing your antenna C is the best one can do to improve things!!! :-) 73, DK7FC ________________________________ Von: owner-rsgb_lf_group@bla
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00401.html (10,284 bytes)

247. LF: AW: Trans Biggleswade contact being planned - revive a Racal Dana 9084 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 19:33:02 +0200
Wow, excellent! I am looking forward to your results and am hopefully that it works at least arround 2 Lambda in DFCW/QRSS-600. If you don't get taht VFO running, here is that, what Wolf(DF2PY) and i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00407.html (15,927 bytes)

248. VLF: RX stations in Canada and US? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:45:29 +0200
Dear VLF, The recent discussions shows that the band is becoming alive, not just by QRO but also QRP stations, vy fine. So, there are more and more stations who can receive the signals on 8,97 kHz. W
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00449.html (13,948 bytes)

249. LF: AW: RE: Extreme Dreaming: Announcement for the 47 km band :-) (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:32:58 +0200
Hi all, Maybe there were some misunderstandings in my last mail since i get a lot of personal mails now in which people think i will start transmitting tomorrow or so. Thus, i want to answer "officia
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00472.html (12,582 bytes)

250. LF: AW: RE: Static protection when using a soundcard as an Rx (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 00:54:26 +0200
Hi Brian and also welcome :-) I would combinate back to back diodes with a isolating transformer for audio. A combination of the hints you heared before ;-) The transformer prevents galvanic coupling
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00493.html (12,437 bytes)

251. LF: AW: Re: testing 8970.2 now (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:21:23 +0200
No. This trace on 8970,2 is there since many weeks. It is a rest of local QRM. I cannot eliminate it. Wolf, if you want to appear on my grabber you should watch it before since if there is a trace on
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00510.html (11,548 bytes)

252. AW: LF: AW: testsig de DLVLF 8970 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:10:35 +0200
Hallo Marco, Ich habe keine Loop mit preamp! ;-) Das sollte auch nicht das Problem sein. Bau dir doch die von Jim/M0BMU!? Gibts schon was neues von Wolf? 73, Stefan ________________________________ V
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00513.html (10,501 bytes)

253. LF: AW: DLVLF with QSY to 8972 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 21:49:55 +0200
Wolf, Currently the natural QRN is about 10 dB higher than before 12 hours. Additionally, if you exceed 8970,0 +0,5/-0,4 Hz, you are out of view of my 600er window and need further 10 dB more to be v
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00529.html (12,989 bytes)

254. LF: AW: new output ratio txfrmr (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 11:53:17 +0200
Hello Wolf, If you transmit on 8971 Hz, than you are not visible on Muskus' or my grabber (unless you are not visible in DFCW-60 but i don't think that ;-) ). Could you transmit on 8970 +- 0,05 Hz? H
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00571.html (11,406 bytes)

255. VLF: DHO38 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 23:00:58 +0200
Dear VLF, DHO-38 (23,4 kHz) is OFF since 7 UTC. Does anybodyknow why? Normally there is a braeak between 7 and 8 UTC. I have never seen such a long break yet... 73, Stefan/DK7FC <<winmail.dat>>
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00589.html (9,447 bytes)

256. LF: AW: RE: RE: Static protection when using a soundcard as an Rx (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:20:03 +0200
Hi Eddie, "Antiparallel" is the description i normally use and i most often heard for such arrangements. :-) 73, Stefan ________________________________ Von: [email protected] im Auf
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00600.html (13,662 bytes)

257. LF: AW: Re: AW: DLVLF qrv again (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:25:46 +0200
Mike, You go to bed at 10' clock in the morning? ;-) GN ;-) ________________________________ Von: [email protected] im Auftrag von Mike-WE0H Gesendet: Sa 12.06.2010 10:06 An: rsgb_lf
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00611.html (13,671 bytes)

258. LF: AW: AW: RE: move from loop to loaded aerial (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:51:11 +0200
Hello Wolf, It seems you have well demonstrated that a loop is not optimal. I should remind that in my "earth antenna" tests, which are comparable to a even more lossy loop (although this could be co
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00652.html (15,171 bytes)

259. LF: AW: even more from loaded aerial (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:05:02 +0200
Wolf, Are the towers insulated at the bottom side? That would be excellent^^ 73, Stefan ________________________________ Von: [email protected] im Auftrag von Wolf Ostwald Gesendet:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00666.html (14,699 bytes)

260. VLF: First try for 5km with an earth antenna on <9 / Dreamers BandT (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 01:02:39 +0200
Dear VLF, Today i tried a first attempt to transmit a 8,97 kHz Signal over a distance of 5km, using an earth antenna. The antenna was, for a first step at the new QTH, the 120m long wire that i used
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00672.html (11,827 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu