Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 59 ]

Total 59 documents matching your query.

21. RE: LF: Rugby LORAN measurement? (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 15:36:28 +0200
Dave, thanks for trying. My travelling didn't happen so I was around today after all, however, as we now know the signal didn't switch off. My thanks to Peter for developing a special piece of softwa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-04/msg00326.html (10,430 bytes)

22. RE: LF: Rugby LORAN measurement? (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 13:51:53 +0200
Sorry John, I don't know the times, but I seem to recall seeing a posting from someone on this reflector recently alluding to the "usual first Tuesday in the month" maintenance at Rugby, also known a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-04/msg00329.html (9,690 bytes)

23. LF: 500kHz - UK: Expression of interest (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:09:42 +0100
Without wishing to raise hopes too much, we may be getting close to Ofcom agreeing to issues a few Special Research Permits (SRP) for operation in the band 501 - 504kHz within the UK. It is expected
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-01/msg00006.html (10,772 bytes)

24. RE: LF: Special Research Permits (501-504kHz) for UK Amateurs (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:39:51 +0100
I should have added that it might be reasonable to add a separate sheet with the issue about field-strength, assumptions and how you arrived at the figure in the RFI assessment box 73 John, G3WKL Jim
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-02/msg00014.html (17,940 bytes)

25. RE: LF: Special Research Permits (501-504kHz) for UK Amateurs (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:39:04 +0100
Mal, see the answer to Jim's query. I really wouldn't make a big issue of this. If Ofcom are concerned about whatever we put in for the near-field assessment I feel sure that we will be able to resol
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-02/msg00015.html (17,947 bytes)

26. RE: LF: Special Research Permits (501-504kHz) for UK Amateurs (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:25:34 +0100
Jim, thanks for raising this issue. The SRP is a generic form that often is related to "experiments" with people asking for permission to run high power (for EME, MS, HF, etc), where the field-streng
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-02/msg00017.html (17,398 bytes)

27. LF: Special Research Permits (501-504kHz) for UK Amateurs (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:16:04 +0100
Ofcom has announced today that a limited number of SRPs will me made available for 12 months from 1st March. See http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radiocomms/ifi/licensing/classes/amateur/Notices/200 70221 and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-02/msg00026.html (9,918 bytes)

28. RE: LF: 501 to 504 (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:26:49 +0100
John, you need to understand that we submitted the proposal to our regulator in Sept 2004, so it takes its time over here also. Well done, Dave. Hopefully, there will be some more to follow soon. 73
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-02/msg00046.html (9,064 bytes)

29. RE: LF: RE: RE: Special Research Permits (501-504kHz) for UK Amateurs (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:25:03 +0100
Pete, I would suggest that you mention the work that you have done at 136kHz, etc 73 John, G3WKL --Original Message-- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-02/msg00093.html (9,702 bytes)

30. LF: RE: RE: Special Research Permits (501-504kHz) for UK Amateurs (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:41:33 +0100
I'm busy building a DDS, but if that fails to work in a sensible timescale I'll need to be xtal controlled, so an agreement where we might cluster for QRSS/DFCW might be worthwhile. This might also b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-02/msg00096.html (12,013 bytes)

31. LF: RE: Re: Special Research Permits (501-504kHz) for UK Amateurs (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:28:59 +0100
Walter, individuals will need to apply to use their licence so it will be a little while before any SRPs are issued; hopefully, in time for the 1st March. experimental access they are expecting us to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-02/msg00097.html (10,763 bytes)

32. LF: RE: [500] 500 bandplan? (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 21:35:14 +0100
I'm not keen on another reflector, but someone made a comment a week or so ago that made sense, which was to prefix the title of 500kHz postings. I don't think the suggestion would work in all cases,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-03/msg00091.html (11,030 bytes)

33. LF: 500: links for technical help (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:11:23 +0100
I've rather (too) quickly put a few links on the RSGB Spectrum Forum website aimed at helping newcomers to 500kHz. These are people who have not perhaps had the full baptism with 136kHz, so may appre
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-03/msg00102.html (8,599 bytes)

34. RE: LF: First UK amateur sigs on 500k band? (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 10:17:05 +0100
Well done Dave to get your station operational so quickly. The results are very interesting at the power level that you were using. Sadly I was in a pub having a meal last evening, so missed the fun.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-03/msg00155.html (10,532 bytes)

35. LF: RE: Re: 501-504kHz reporting (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:32:20 +0100
Mal, sorry I don't know what's been issued as my input is early in the process. 73 John, G3WKL --Original Message-- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-03/msg00214.html (13,442 bytes)

36. LF: RE: Guidelines for 501kHz SRP applications. {01} (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 10:16:38 +0100
Re the previous e-mail, which I am not sure got reflected, the guidelines for SRP applicants can now be viewed at http://www.rsgb-spectrumforum.org.uk/ofcom_501kHz_%20srp.htm 73 John, G3WKL RSGB HF M
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-03/msg00295.html (11,548 bytes)

37. LF: 501-504kHz reporting (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 11:25:51 +0100
With several stations likely to be transmitting this weekend and as I will most likely be speaking with Ofcom on Monday re some of the applications under consideration, it would be helpful to the cau
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-03/msg00343.html (12,011 bytes)

38. LF: RFI from 136kHz transmissions (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:30:11 +0100
In the discussion that I am currently having with Ofcom over the RFI assessment for 501-504kHz applications, the question has been raised as to whether interference has been noted with nearby neighbo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-03/msg00365.html (10,054 bytes)

39. LF: Wandel & Goltermann TFH-2 (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:14:14 +0100
I've had one of the above field-strength meters for a while and could do with sight of an manual / circuit diagram. Done a search on the web, but with no luck. Can anyone offer any assitance with inf
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-04/msg00172.html (8,070 bytes)

40. LF: RE: Field Strength Meter (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:01:41 +0100
Chris, your experiments of measuring ERP are interesting. How close is the result that you obtained with that derived from aerial modelling and aerial current measurement? To what extent do you think
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00017.html (11,945 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu