Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:: 296 ]

Total 296 documents matching your query.

1. LF: keps (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:56:37 +0000
Hello All Thanks to everyone that sent me the address for KEPS via this list and also direct emails. de Mal/G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00006.html (7,740 bytes)

2. LF: 73 khz (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:38:38 +0000
Hi All Maybe it is time to concentrate on 73 khz since we only have a couple of years left to experiment and break some distance records!!!! Too much time has been wasted on the transatlantic attempt
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00016.html (8,281 bytes)

3. LF: EA QSO (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:38:52 +0000
G3NYK asked if anyone has worked EA yet. I worked EA last year xband. He was on 3570 khz and my signal on 136.6 khz. His qth was on the CT/EA border and he gave me 579. My signal about the same stren
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00017.html (8,324 bytes)

4. LF: keps (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 16:48:46 +0000
Hi All Although this is the other end of the spectrum from LF, does anyone know the email address for keplerian elements for amateur and other satellites. I use the IT prog with auto load for either
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00046.html (7,871 bytes)

5. Re: LF: TransAtlantic QSO (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 08:57:56 +0000
Hi Larry, Hearty Congratulations to you both. Hurray! The corks are flying here. Yes I did see your transmission. It first appeared around 22.30 and faded out around 00.10 and nothing more seen for
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00073.html (11,455 bytes)

6. LF: SPLIT (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 08:31:08 +0000
Hi All Regarding the suggested split between so called hi-tech modes, already being used by commercial operators and the normal cw for those competent to use it. I think it would be better to continu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00099.html (8,385 bytes)

7. LF: VA3LK (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:52:35 +0000
Hi All Larry seems to be claiming that he has achieved a first qso across the atlantic according to his own rules. The majority postings on here have reservations or do not agree. If some want to ben
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00115.html (8,614 bytes)

8. Re: LF: RE: Where next? (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:46:10 +0000
Mike's comments still seem to make the assumption that a human brain can do better than software. Why ? It doesn't matter how good your eyes are at perceiving subtle differences of tone or colour in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00129.html (13,154 bytes)

9. LF: FENCE (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:46:30 +0000
HI All It is encouraging to see some getting OFF the fence and expressing an opinion about the recent activities on 136 transatlantic. It is obvious that they are not convinced that a proper qso has
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00130.html (8,477 bytes)

10. Re: LF: 73 KHz? (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:46:20 +0000
Is anyone operating 73 KHz regularly? Is there any slight chance that a ham transmission on this frequency can be heard across the pond? Hi Dexter om. You have pinched my suggestion that I listed a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00131.html (9,240 bytes)

11. LF: TR QSO (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:27:45 +0000
Hello all As John points out EME procedure(TMO reporting) means full callsigns and reports must be fully exchanged between the two parties at the time of contact, which does not mean days or weeks la
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00148.html (9,049 bytes)

12. Re: LF: transatlantic qso (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:14:56 +0000
Hi all, I am writing this email with great trepidation. Firstly what I am about to write could be to my benefit because I have been involved with a previous claim for a transatlantic exchange of inf
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00149.html (12,169 bytes)

13. Re: LF: First Trans-Atlantic QSO (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 19:16:44 +0000
Laurie and Larry Many congratulations on an incredible achievement. Has anyone else noticed that it is the same few congratulating each other over and over again for minding a machine that is making
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00181.html (10,184 bytes)

14. LF: Insulators (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 19:16:35 +0000
Hi All I am surprised that no one has tried the lobster pot sninners for insulators. All your troubles could be over, especially at 50 Pence each. They have not let me down yet but maybe I do not hav
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00182.html (7,863 bytes)

15. LF: change (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 20:30:42 +0000
Hi All Freeserve has virtually ground to a halt so I have changed to netscapeonline and find it much better. User id gii3kev. G3kev and gi3kev are already in use and not available. 73 de g3kev
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00241.html (7,613 bytes)

16. Re: LF: First Transatlantic QSO (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:40:59 +0000
G3KEV Just to show that you are NOT a sad old. I am probably younger than you !!!!!!!! I think you were a late starter. twit with a very large chip on your shoulder, why don't you offer your unreser
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00251.html (10,144 bytes)

17. LF: 73 khz (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 19:10:56 +0000
For those suitably equipped on 73 khz with a better than average antenna and able to generate 1w erp there is a possibility that they might be seen on slow cw or wobble mode across in W/VE. Long befo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00252.html (8,628 bytes)

18. Re: LF: Re. LF LDO>ZJ<ZZ a two way? (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:05:16 +0000
I personally dont think that there can be much doubt that this was a QSO,between LDO and ZJ, with ZJ having a remote Tx at ZZs location. If there had been a 250 mile(dist. ZZ to ZJ I belive) switch
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00275.html (10,322 bytes)

19. Re: LF: lf transatlantic exchange of information (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:22:09 +0000
<< Congratulations to Peter and Jack Screen shots will follow 73 de John VE1ZJ John Jack Peter. It's interesting, one step closer and I await Mal's response with trepidation !!!!!! (hi) Hello David.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00279.html (10,815 bytes)

20. Re: LF: Time & Frequency & so on (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 20:48:25 +0000
Dear LF Group, Re - the discussion of GPS derrived timing, DDS frequency sources, etc. It seems to me that increasing layers of complexity being proposed could do with some review before rushing hea
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00280.html (9,398 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu