Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 113 ]

Total 113 documents matching your query.

41. Re: LF: DFCW Parameters (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 05:47:30 +1000
G'day Rik et al... Oops - I mean VFSKCW version 4. Also since version 1 there has been an option to include a tone for identifying spaces by transmitting a mid-tone either between characters or betwe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00134.html (10,191 bytes)

42. Re: LF: Puckeridge Decca station - Big & small antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 06:22:55 +1000
G'day Rik, including yours are but dummy loads. I am happy that you are saving a file of my observations. I kill all messages when read, Well that answer my questions! Confused, inconsistent posts wh
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00275.html (12,840 bytes)

43. LF: Re: CFA Antenna: miraculous? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2000 06:49:36 +1000
G'day All, Here in Sydney Australia we have (had) a CFA installation in commercial use. I have done relative FS measurements (single point) at a distance of 60Km and can report that the CFA antenna i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00202.html (9,924 bytes)

44. LF: Re: re:e-groups (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 09:09:33 +1100
G'day Dave, I checked. There were only comments and experiences related - no "criticism" - that is, until you mentioned it. For most of us it matters little whether the message is delivered in 30 sec
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00068.html (8,613 bytes)

45. LF: Re: RE reflector slow (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 13:15:00 +1100
G'day Alan, Hi Steve well I guess the electricity has to struggle its way uphill from where you are Hi! Plus the electrons would have to flip over in their orbits. Are the egoups hosted in the States
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00170.html (9,018 bytes)

46. LF: Re: Re: re e-groups...reflector slow (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 11:14:11 +1100
G'day Alan, Here is the results of a parallel post to the RSGB group and my egroup ([email protected]). Post Sent: 10:55:00 AM Appeared from egroup: 10:55:40 (elapsed time 40 seconds) Appeared RSGB
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00174.html (9,096 bytes)

47. LF: Re: re e-groups...reflector slow (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 10:55:09 +1100
G'day Alan, The RSGB reflector is always slow from here down-under - so much so that I sometimes wonder if the post had got lost. Nothing to do with my ISP. E-groups posts (sample of over a year now)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00175.html (9,190 bytes)

48. LF: Re: QRSS - "LEK" raw data available (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 18:22:18 +1100
If you are interested there are some GIFs of the spectrum of the raw data at a BW of 0.125Hz and 0.0625Hz uploaded on my site. Go to the URL below and scroll down to the LF section and click on the "
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00403.html (9,015 bytes)

49. LF: Synchronised QRSS... (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 07:22:33 +1100
G'day All, With all the interest in synchronised QRSS it might be a good time to draw your collective attentions to some of the experimental modes I have been pushing for over a year now. Go to the U
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00505.html (8,777 bytes)

50. LF: Re: Volunteer (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 07:08:42 +1100
G'day Mal, I will volunteer to be the first to be banished from the list for discussing the use of CW on LF. Oh dear, seems there isn't a rush to try and dissaude you from your voluntary banishment.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00072.html (9,845 bytes)

51. LF: Re: RSGB LF Listserve etiquette (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:22:43 +1100
G'day John, I suspect that I am not alone (no rash of supporting e-mail please) in not having the time to monitor and benefit from this list on account of the large amount of "off-subject" posting. O
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00116.html (8,475 bytes)

52. LF: CW allocations... (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:43:14 +1100
G'day All, As usual in these debates the proponents are wandering off the topic. The original reason for even bothering to respond to any of this was NOT to ban or get rid of CW. Those who have read
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00119.html (11,457 bytes)

53. LF: Fw: [Lowfer] Proposed new LF signal format (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 18:37:17 +1100
Oops, I meant to send it to the group !!! G'day Stewart, Great stuff !!! Once again the US LowFer mentality has produced some quality work (don't work harder, work smarter). Your knowledge and analys
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00120.html (11,852 bytes)

54. LF: Re: 2 tone (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 08:47:50 +1100
G'day Andy, logical conclusions, with seperate tones for >each different alphabetical characters - see 'FDK' on his web pages http://www.qsl.net/vk2zto. The first version wasPiccolo as designed in th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00127.html (10,058 bytes)

55. LF: Re: Re: Re: REALITY CHECK (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 08:22:22 +1100
G'day Mal, If you do not have LF experience or cannot send/copy CW then your view point is invalid. Concentrate on KANGAROO or DINGO projects, where you will feel more at home!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00128.html (9,338 bytes)

56. LF: Re: Time efficient code (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 08:10:06 +1100
G'day Rick, Assume the transmission speed is 60 seconds dotlength. In that case the time needed to transmit 'CQ ON7YD K' would take : 114 minutes in QRSS 40 minutes in DFCW 30 minutes in '7 tone mode
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00129.html (9,447 bytes)

57. LF: Re: Re: Re: This and that (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 07:21:29 +1100
G'day Dave, Whatever your view such comments do not help one iota. Steve GW4ALG made some valid points and a less hostile response from someone who earlier in the week was recommending a code of prac
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00130.html (13,012 bytes)

58. LF: Re: This and that (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 16:05:57 +1100
G'day Steve, In common with several other LF experimenters in the UK, I have four 1W QRSS stations within 200 km of my QTH. Gee whiz, I wish I had your terrible luck. It must be tough !!! Here in VK
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00153.html (9,671 bytes)

59. LF: Re: REALITY CHECK (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 12:16:05 +1100
G'day Mal, There is magic connected with the old Cinema and the ability to send/copy morse code. And it helps to be completely in the dark to participate in both :-) Steve VK2ZTO
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00159.html (8,008 bytes)

60. LF: Reality check... (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 08:11:14 +1100
G'day All, With all the hand-wringing and lamentations about the abandonment of the good wife CW for the QRSSS jezebel on LF, it might be useful to reflect on the reality of the environment in which
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00238.html (13,488 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu