Dear LF-friends, This sort of problem is going to continue until we can get Jack to move his crystal away from this part of the band and into the QRS segments. You can hardly blame Dave.< ... does an
Dave, saw your picture .... very impressive ... will re-think my own construction a little bit ... good luck with your re-construction! Best 73 and hope to hear you soon again! Geri, DK8KW (W1KW)
Dear LF group members, Under http://users.mesatop.com/~ghansen/ you can find a new PSK31/RTTY/ASCII, etc. program for Soundblaster use, that was written by KD5HIO. This program contains some experime
Alberto I2PHD, As a matter of fact, at 137 kHz the inductance values aren't so big to make it impractical to wind them. At 9 kHz things are a bit different...< Alberto, first of all thanks for provid
Hello Magne, The Norwegian Post and Telecommunications Authority has issued new regulations allowing the use of frequencies below 9kHz (and above 400GHz) on a general non-restricted basis (valid from
A suitable analogy for the Grab feature might be an optical filter that happens to have the same response curve as the incandescent light source being shone through it. The more such filters one stac
Hello LF-Group, Hi Steve, But a strong intermittent carrier is clobbering 136.5 kHz, the most commonly-used frequency for normal CW operation. Did anyone else hear the QRM? Could it be a rogue QRSS t
To date we have had CW, QRSS, BPSK and associated data modes, and now we are getting slow voice which requires its own space. < ... just a few words regarding slow-voice: I don't think that this mod
Hello and a Happy New Year to all of you! I have posted some further information on Marus' (DF6NM) and my 1st Slow-Voice QSO on LF on my homepage http://www.qru.de/slowvoice.html (also: http://home.t
Hello LF Group, after the great successes with QRSS, US Lowfers now are experimenting with a new binary mode called "WOLF" (Weak-signal Operation on Low Frequency). The inventor and author of a small
I look forward to further discussion on exactly what theory fits this practical result. I don't think I can add a good portion of theory why it works, however, I can through my two cents into the di
My model can't get any better than ±2.52Hz off (in Cw) i have better for 136 but it would be usefull for 73 soon. Isn't it possible to replace the 4,5-70 pF C with a 5-90 pF C< ... tried to replace
Alan, G3NYK wrote a lot of words I fully support, including Above all, and as with Amateur Radio in general, variety of interest is our strength, and should not divide us.< I vote against splitting t
Larry and Laurie, congratulations on this success, despite what other people might say, at least I am sure that despite of the first successcful transatlantic QSO on LF you can claim to have had the
Dear LF-Group, just reading Mal's comments with a smile on my face ... Stick to the established rules that apply to all other amateur band qso's. Another factor to consider. To claim awards like dxcc
Hello LF Group, What do you think ?< ... whatever way we consider this QSO, 2-way, 3-way or not valid at all ... I definetely believe that late Peter Bobek, DJ8WL would have loved that pioneering ach
Having a really good way to get real-time feedback would be useful - perhaps a chat room? .. again as a reminder: you are all invited to use the LF chat room that is on my homepage at http://www.qru.
Hello LF Group, having spend a week on the other side of the pond myself (however, without LF receiving capabilities) I was surprised to hear about all the recent successes on the transatlantic tests
Hello LF group, for those of you capable of understanding German: in the next edition of "Intermedia" of the Austrian Broadcasting Service ROI (Radio Österreich International) there will be a short i
Hello Uwe and LF-group, Hi all, during night ARGO/30s-dots/AGC-off captured on 18.03.01 at 0116utc the enclosed pic. first line: lf-meteorites ? second line: IK5ZPV third line: DK8KW ? 4th line: G3AQ
