Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: VLF NA Ebnaut

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: VLF NA Ebnaut
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 16:42:52 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1514562173; bh=x0vlDOcHT+UFUv7F7Ndom8H626HuT12ROAnzRT83XX0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=EXK8r3+l9YbhqnelhC1SxY/WYBTWM/DTrQO1XLHypzQsqpVOCVF1xtEcHV/mguKgP 8Bgivks8rQqWXdQvc6XIyTFdzBwNKs0RMSkQ06GAusyDH0XhYg0NUwBHgHgdDOkGXH MUcAuKXuoreVj87EO3nN/YuwUHVNcW3Ln7kBWJdyZbfSnIWFw4wo27KOMsm/yuH6RD hEqGCzvIfrvJgcVX95jcOIbnG3ZZL1Jf1KpNgmtiX63+ovLDMPJv4UAo+U2TU9XvK+ R+rGXCCKu7UNPpF+TC3G2pac2DYXB1UA+xhTUbS+ubsLY7kA75eyEofoaSkNiSD+Ji VftF6yvw0uypw==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Am 29.12.2017 08:51, schrieb Paul Nicholson:
I've examined the software at Forest and all appears to be
working fine, at least as well as my own.
OK Paul, thanks for working that out.

A near field reference for testing the phase stability is certainly a good idea. It should be there all the time ideally. Then one could even correct the faulty segments. A safety redundance.

If we see distant
MSK phase changing (which we probably will), is it caused by
the rx or the propagation?   Alpha signals are a bit tricky
to use when there are two transmitters interleaved in the
signal being averaged.
In my Alpha RDF spectrogram, the colours (indicating the phase) are reproducing day by day quite nicely. There are 2 glitches. One is when the TX switches the phase at 0 clock Moscow time. The other glitch is at 0 UTC. Then there is the slow change of the phase between day and night. I am in another location and it is another path though.

Perhaps just the weakness of the signal at Forest?
Eb/N0 -0.1 = S/N 7.5 dB in the 30.6 uHz bandwidth in
which the phase is measured.
Could be the reason. But you are comparing just 2 or 3 days. On my 1 character message at 17470.1 Hz there were no unexpected phase changes

Another idea could be a damage in an electrical component in the high impedance preamp. Maybe a water drop that changes the capacity somewhere, leading to a phase shift. This would not affect the timing but the phase Just a guess.

I find it most useful to get an overview of the system performance by looking on a 'wideband' spectrogram, covering e.g. 0...24 kHz and half a day or a day. You will immediately see if something changed, like the signal levels, the phase and timing and sample rate correction (when running an Alpha plot for example). Or you will see if a new QRM source appeared or disappeared. All this without a particular search for eventual errors, just the usual daily view on that spectrogram. I would feel blind without that :-)

So in the end, is it propagation or not? For me it sound unlikely that it is propagation. On 17.4701 kHz, over such a distance, maybe. But not on 8270 Hz on the path between VO1NA and Mike. Uuh, another strange idea: Maybe a faulty component in the preamp that changes the phase frequency dependently, like a capacitor moving the edge frequency of a LPF or HPF and changing the phase hereby?

73, Stefan



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>