To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | VLF: TA east to west? |
From: | DK7FC <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 07 Dec 2017 11:34:34 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1512642881; bh=UmzpaQNsbdiE2Nhhap/73doAzKr37UG1VA8py7FzIho=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=jqAPBb1VzEbYbCn41mDksoH3STnd5tVSw12eXy7X2YO8lfSv8CwWmfJJHQFLueTAX HEcGiJDNx4P5EGfpcFDUTUumZueF3X4GDDgcjJS7RL0EJ64mWc9iT/N/RtrGwqj0GB bDKZ38vZRxnA6WslNpiR86Z05vldlMn5EWFxI0i7tcR7JxytowU4CiKusHyiWzG9MU gxRvHjO6ALkJw2HMu0xsAgwgr4aKuPsp1smygqm2qa8A7MSO4D2coQdqBt1dQsN2CN srwUWSseGkFbcShyHytetGEI7Crbk0Xc7fybN/hGBVdSf9JWFvRYbYiA81zU/Uhu7P KCK8pHtGA6nAQ== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6VmLfG7AA692ajKxa6+swztKOmi-YcattQQOi_mMPzitA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6X8GZOzduMGcppmDHdTDQ6R5Pq6GHSUuRuuRASe9WbA7Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAEduzkpDMw-kvmbU9q4DMhtzeQJdQd=5D0Xqa73auHaVGpH-8A@mail.gmail.com> <CAL4b5hBWRNbMSm7P2H6BTDTa3qPEiHNgF16R9o3A-X9ggAV6uw@mail.gmail.com> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AAB0EB9@servigilant.vigilant.local> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6UU_AWP3S4K0XT4yju_ZKi+DM3Z8LYAOu0_KrHXR_W9aA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6VSci3YUufSQ73iV2jFAg-i46zLzr9dxNeGwabCkL9Xzw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Paul, VLF, I changed the subject of the discussion... Am 06.12.2017 22:49, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > How far could this signal travel! We are missing > RX stations everywhere! Forest, Virginia, is reporting Eb/N0 = -7.5dB on the 4 char transmission. That's -38.55 dB in 1Hz. Distance is 6817 km. That is great!! Thanks for looking on that receiver! -7.5 dB for 4 characters during a suboptimal time period, that's fantastic! We are very close to a first east-to-west VLF TA decode/detection i think.I will try to run more antenna current this evening and i will use just a 1 character message. That could work! Please, could you check how deep the last 3 character message is buried in the noise on that RX? The timing is close to optimal and just 3 characters, so the Eb/N0 could be -5.x dB? What about the other receivers on your list http://abelian.org/vlf/ There are even farer distant monitors. Maybe you know the operators and the performance of their system. Is there another one which could have a chance to decode a message. Unfortunately the SR is just 32 kS/s. With 48 kS/s we could check when the terminator of JXN and HWU appear there. So i will check when the sunset will be there by using google earth. Stacking will be required, at least for longer messages. It will be interesting how this works on sch a distance!Recommend starting a bit later, say 00:00 or 01:00, and maybe we do some stacking too? 73, Stefan -- Paul Nicholson -- |
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA, DK7FC |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA, Jacek Lipkowski |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA, Paul Nicholson |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: TA east to west?, Paul Nicholson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |