Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA
From: Daniele Caccia <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 12:07:09 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=oUskGW3l73z9FJkbsioF1oRNL9u6JV/E+POgdCPvQ14=; b=LN8eoiVs9O3gt6LDpI7wS3tSgS0wsqQdNwKKLpPUBFI9Ssr7Bt3pF+6WrFZ21nO7OI MjdcjlUiOtn60GTRD5itA0Ujid1/C6/XB6L7Xe8yhm4dk2lojq2CwAU1Bk4LigEqaoDJ U4RN6CL34EC0rqfAlZ8MGG/PnDMExklVgweQ3OyJIVZ4mGlxit4tTKJ5Q4OqykZlchFD TAg/P2BoiZYGsW6xN95jt/3LyXhhovpayaJsuMn31YzelNph/MlkVKobMvsOZxmZR23y tsz2GKt8J8xNbnVjQ+VLwPIMH1oh84+A2i9DDITp3zbUzyF2OsBjpDhF3YkFy3vEMboe KTkA==
In-reply-to: <CAEduzkpDMw-kvmbU9q4DMhtzeQJdQd=5D0Xqa73auHaVGpH-8A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6VmLfG7AA692ajKxa6+swztKOmi-YcattQQOi_mMPzitA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6X8GZOzduMGcppmDHdTDQ6R5Pq6GHSUuRuuRASe9WbA7Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAEduzkpDMw-kvmbU9q4DMhtzeQJdQd=5D0Xqa73auHaVGpH-8A@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Dear VLF er
Congratulations to all for the results obtained so far!
Best regards from Daniele SWL I55387FI -ITALY-


 


2017-12-02 10:30 GMT+01:00 Alberto Martinez <[email protected]>:
Congratulation Stefan and Luis!

It´s weak but seeable. very good work.

73.
Alberto-EA4GHB

2017-12-02 9:57 GMT+01:00 DK7FC <[email protected]>:
Hello VLF friends,

This morning i looked on the EA5DOM VLF grabber and saw much better traces of the carrier on 17.4701 kHz.
https://ea5dom.ure.es/grabber/index.html

I find this is a valid one-way contact or carrier detection and i think it is the first time that this was done by amateurs between DL and EA.
A distance of 1393 km, http://k7fry.com/grid/?qth=IM98XN&from=jn49ik00wd

It looks like there is some QSB on that path, higher than observed a similar distance at 8270 Hz.
We can now think about improvements and about a first message attempt...

73, Stefan



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>