Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA |
| From: | DK7FC <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 07 Dec 2017 11:23:00 +0100 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1512642185; bh=lcBe0gjBUACAS0xd+kElrxOobIraXfPA+nU+syi8CaU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=aO7zto0p1NcSAaUNCJ0+g3Vp6QvZPzugrYLUx1RodwGy48t1/49CjZu87Bbh4lgGE EC+IxakdUGi4QyNkiJ+SxecroasJ/yNOpwcxMk3LC5EgQjQMRpWChM3JTsJlZHHnh6 Tn5nxou1yPq7SUnNOwCsEq90sxS4qRbsutk1vQrcsedbtnJN6/K3gKxQ8K7G+Swtgt dK+0mY6XNPeYkZa3N2Q+iKMu0qowJmAFNyd5SBNEFpDSFPaIPUh7tjn9f/Zw9WnetA m1SRWCE+o8dUw5eDwpHkc2ZfnGDQpGLbR80OmAAXqlJxXTdYoeG+yOVZpp0+VIKTjh 3HLHUasYjGZKA== |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6VmLfG7AA692ajKxa6+swztKOmi-YcattQQOi_mMPzitA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6X8GZOzduMGcppmDHdTDQ6R5Pq6GHSUuRuuRASe9WbA7Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAEduzkpDMw-kvmbU9q4DMhtzeQJdQd=5D0Xqa73auHaVGpH-8A@mail.gmail.com> <CAL4b5hBWRNbMSm7P2H6BTDTa3qPEiHNgF16R9o3A-X9ggAV6uw@mail.gmail.com> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AAB0EB9@servigilant.vigilant.local> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6UU_AWP3S4K0XT4yju_ZKi+DM3Z8LYAOu0_KrHXR_W9aA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hello Jacek, Paul, VLF,Great results! And thanks for your greatly working grabber. I did never expect that the effect is so expressed. As Paul says, it may be worth to do a series of optimisations to find optimum filter responses for the special band with it strong 'neighbour' stations. Would be interesting to see how strong JXN and HWU can become in VK7 for example!!! :-) Regarding the notches inside the passband. How 'deep' is the notch in vlfrx-tools? I think there can be an improvement if the stop-band attenuation is only as high as necessary, say 20 dB for JXN, not as high as possible (> 100 dB). 73, Stefan Am 07.12.2017 08:26, schrieb Jacek Lipkowski: On Wed, 6 Dec 2017, Paul Nicholson wrote:vtfilter -e eqmap -h bp,f=17470,w=3000 -h bs,f=16400,w=600 -hbs,f=18300,w=800with your filtering settings i immediately went from no signal to great signal on my grabber:https://klubnl.pl/wpr/en/index.php/klubnl-pl-grabbers/tymczasowy-grabber-sq5bpf-do-testow-stefana-dk7fc-na-17-4701hz/i will reprocess the whole grabber window from 2 december, and after that have the grabber updated live again.Maybe that's the problem with this band then, just getting the right filtering before the blanker.seems so.btw what is the reason to use a 3kHz filter before the noise blanker and not a narrower one? i can understand the reason for not using 10Hz bandwidth, but why not 1kHz?i was wondering how you got at the 3kHz figure? VY 73 Jacek / SQ5BPF |
| Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA, Paul Nicholson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | VLF: TA east to west?, DK7FC |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA, Jacek Lipkowski |
| Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA, Markus Vester |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |