--------------------------------------------------
From:
<
[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 3:10
PM
To: <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: New
version OPERA >> ''Opera Dynamic'' <<
> Graham
>
> I won't be quite a 'charatable' as Mike
...
>
> There were at least two false detections on my
transmitted signal (WD2XNS) last night that I saw ...
> one into G
and one into SV. About the only way to tell they were false detections was
the time lag
> between actual and the 'Deep Search' output - it
wasn't the expected 4 minutes. Had there been no
> 'real' receptions
during that time period one might have actually believed what was reported
... as
> you did and reported on the Yahoo reflector.
>
> On receive from here last night from there were false detections of
VO1NA.
>
> I saw one detection of a G station in JA make the
list! This was clearly a false detection. No doubt
> there were
plenty of other false detections but after this couple hour 'outing' with
1.5.5 I gave up
> on it. It's clearly not ready for prime time and
should be pulled from circulation and return to the
> drawing
board!
>
> Perhaps the author, instead of taking the time to
write a 'propaganda' .pdf page about DF6NM's OPDS
> and include it
with the download, should spend more time actually making his software work
as well
> as Markus's. In almost a year of using OPDS I have
identified only one false detection. This is
> severly at odds with
Jose's test of OPDS. Since Jose seems to now like the idea of Deep Search,
> maybe he should 'borrow' more ideas from Markus ... like the
correlation % and dB 'certainty'
> indicator, an accurate time
indicator and a highly accurate frequency readout. These indicators,
> especially when correlated with other OPDS users grabbers, makes
the very rare false detection with
> OPDS obvious.
>
>
At this point Markus's OPDS runs circles around Jose's Deep Search ...
regardless of what his
> 'propaganda' page says.
>
> Jay
W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2
>
>
>
