--------------------------------------------------
From:
<
[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 3:10 PM
To:
<
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: New version
OPERA >> ''Opera Dynamic'' <<
>
Graham
>
> I won't be quite a 'charatable' as Mike ...
>
> There were at least two false detections on my transmitted signal
(WD2XNS) last night that I saw ...
> one into G and one into SV. About
the only way to tell they were false detections was the time lag
>
between actual and the 'Deep Search' output - it wasn't the expected 4 minutes.
Had there been no
> 'real' receptions during that time period one might
have actually believed what was reported ... as
> you did and reported on
the Yahoo reflector.
>
> On receive from here last night from there
were false detections of VO1NA.
>
> I saw one detection of a G
station in JA make the list! This was clearly a false detection. No doubt
> there were plenty of other false detections but after this couple hour
'outing' with 1.5.5 I gave up
> on it. It's clearly not ready for prime
time and should be pulled from circulation and return to the
> drawing
board!
>
> Perhaps the author, instead of taking the time to write
a 'propaganda' .pdf page about DF6NM's OPDS
> and include it with the
download, should spend more time actually making his software work as well
> as Markus's. In almost a year of using OPDS I have identified only one
false detection. This is
> severly at odds with Jose's test of OPDS.
Since Jose seems to now like the idea of Deep Search,
> maybe he should
'borrow' more ideas from Markus ... like the correlation % and dB 'certainty'
> indicator, an accurate time indicator and a highly accurate frequency
readout. These indicators,
> especially when correlated with other OPDS
users grabbers, makes the very rare false detection with
> OPDS
obvious.
>
> At this point Markus's OPDS runs circles around Jose's
Deep Search ... regardless of what his
> 'propaganda' page says.
>
> Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2
>
>
>
