--------------------------------------------------
From:
<
[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 3:10
PM
To: <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: New
version OPERA >> ''Opera Dynamic'' <<
> Graham
>
> I won't be quite a 'charatable' as Mike
...
>
> There were at least two false detections on my
transmitted signal (WD2XNS) last night that I saw ...
> one into G and
one into SV. About the only way to tell they were false detections was the
time lag
> between actual and the 'Deep Search' output - it wasn't the
expected 4 minutes. Had there been no
> 'real' receptions during that
time period one might have actually believed what was reported ... as
>
you did and reported on the Yahoo reflector.
>
> On receive from
here last night from there were false detections of VO1NA.
>
> I
saw one detection of a G station in JA make the list! This was clearly a false
detection. No doubt
> there were plenty of other false detections but
after this couple hour 'outing' with 1.5.5 I gave up
> on it. It's
clearly not ready for prime time and should be pulled from circulation and
return to the
> drawing board!
>
> Perhaps the author,
instead of taking the time to write a 'propaganda' .pdf page about DF6NM's
OPDS
> and include it with the download, should spend more time
actually making his software work as well
> as Markus's. In almost a
year of using OPDS I have identified only one false detection. This is
> severly at odds with Jose's test of OPDS. Since Jose seems to now
like the idea of Deep Search,
> maybe he should 'borrow' more ideas
from Markus ... like the correlation % and dB 'certainty'
> indicator,
an accurate time indicator and a highly accurate frequency readout. These
indicators,
> especially when correlated with other OPDS users
grabbers, makes the very rare false detection with
> OPDS
obvious.
>
> At this point Markus's OPDS runs circles around
Jose's Deep Search ... regardless of what his
> 'propaganda' page
says.
>
> Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2
>
>
>
