Actually, and to give some credit where it is due, they have recently
published some interesting stuff by Stuart G8CYW on optical comms. in
PW. A 30khz sub-carrier on a beam of light after transverting from the
80Metre band seems like interesting fun!
73
On 08/09/13 22:31, pat wrote:
Don't forget that some of us also have fond memories of "Someone's
Waving Magazine", Graham!
73
On 08/09/13 18:29, Graham wrote:
And those who go a little more ,
Cams' comic
so im reliably informed
G,
But , what actually is he talking about in the article ?
--------------------------------------------------
From: "pat" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 6:20 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: "Warren Ziegler" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band
Warren,
While many of us (particularly those of us of a certain age) have an
affection stretching back to near childhood for that publication it
is not for nothing that we nickname it "Practically Witless Monthly"
:>)
73
On 08/09/13 02:53, Warren Ziegler wrote:
Tony Nailer G4CFY has a bit in his "Practical Wireless" column
"Technical for the terrified" this month on the 137 kHz band in
which he writes it off as worthless.
"With the limitation of antenna efficiency together with a
bandwidth of only 100Hz, there really isn't much that can be done
with this band."
Anyone on the list know Tony?
Who is in the best position to write a rebuttal that PW will publish?
--
73 Warren K2ORS
WD2XGJ
WD2XSH/23
WE2XEB/2
WE2XGR/1
--
73 de pat g4gvw
es gd dx
qth nr Felixstowe
East Coast UK
--
73 de pat g4gvw
es gd dx
qth nr Felixstowe
East Coast UK
|
