To: | Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>, [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band |
From: | "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 08 Sep 2013 09:59:32 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <CAMFjj72EVAUx61a7rZeR41ufXx4z2A2h+UK+DYBj=EPqd0waxg@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <CAMFjj72EVAUx61a7rZeR41ufXx4z2A2h+UK+DYBj=EPqd0waxg@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Letter to PW sent today. Mike, G3XDV On 7 Sep 2013 at 21:53, Warren Ziegler wrote: > Tony Nailer G4CFY has a bit in his "Practical Wireless" column > "Technical for the terrified" this month on the 137 kHz band in which > he writes it off as worthless. > > "With the limitation of antenna efficiency together with a bandwidth > of only 100Hz, there really isn't much that can be done with this > band." > > Anyone on the list know Tony? > Who is in the best position to write a rebuttal that PW will publish? > > > -- > 73 Warren K2ORS > WD2XGJ > WD2XSH/23 > WE2XEB/2 > WE2XGR/1 > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: EU, Markus Vester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: FC NM in CT, jrusgrove |
Previous by Thread: | LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band, Warren Ziegler |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band, pat |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |