To: | rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band |
From: | Warren Ziegler <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 7 Sep 2013 21:53:29 -0400 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=fail [email protected]; dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) d=gmail.com |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IRBLxYbhH/8TsURkX7eSX9RTvJCt31otCJQpB9cdkwk=; b=w/23ux0RY1MgRQcLZj4O/7DopoQR2v/GX/hUBTfIeyEugiHHjDzno8H9vJzdhADCTj u5NiHbXomuwdA+0+9B0Cy9n4ZvRcxDQDMfV2+mEmJNhkbC7hvVxJhn1sknMQ7eVR97fl MGZt/hZ8DKeIs1hWQpLjh485h8iLH9GUSHw8Oeu6ipjunbdskYv1iQBZ0FsoSqqZAv2T LqbJUAGMI+zuCqiTJhhW0EVRk3KH9qf1UZ2vyFZ2bRcCZPZrwOSnTl40GY75Vo0o+KYl X9scevleGtFcbJIy0TcZEBE+2hUzGTH8+pafTJZpDxbxJOPm8CHDU25klnRZqk4tWCzA BLzg== |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Tony Nailer G4CFY has a bit in his "Practical Wireless" column "Technical for the terrified" this month on the 137 kHz band in which he writes it off as worthless.
"With the limitation of antenna efficiency together with a bandwidth of only 100Hz, there really isn't much that can be done with this band." Anyone on the list know Tony?
Who is in the best position to write a rebuttal that PW will publish? 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: 21:42 136 G8HUH de RX3QFM Op8 1790 mi -33 dB in KO91OO with 0.25w + 15m umbrella, Graham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: AW: DF2JP, Joe |
Previous by Thread: | LF: 21:42 136 G8HUH de RX3QFM Op8 1790 mi -33 dB in KO91OO with 0.25w + 15m umbrella, Graham |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band, Mike Dennison |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |