Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? |
| From: | John Rabson <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:48:15 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <035601cc6065$67f3dc20$66a5fe04@ctrask> |
| References: | <16BC8B3CA8672445BC2A29B4C14A26D4379ED2AAB4@exlnmb01.eur.nsroot.net> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <9CD1E11E8BC9402CB4AECECAC4088443@JimPC> <00f801cc6004$c2282bd0$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <CAJqZy6yoySSmxUwW9nS6u6b7p9PK6nm4XQbFbKpKydjB70-1vw@mail.gmail.com> <004801cc6055$87313f20$4001a8c0@lark> <1313971196.2595.7.camel@pat-compaq-evo> <035601cc6065$67f3dc20$66a5fe04@ctrask> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
From an engineering point of view, a scientific theory does not have to be true. It just has to be useful. That is, it enables us to build something to meet our needs and for an acceptable cost. For the FSL antenna to be taken seriously, we need one or more examples of successful implementations, preferably combined with a set of formulae from which we can construct devices to meet our requirements. The same applies (by the way) to the Cross Field Antenna. I have read the patent specification and I cannot see from that how to build something for 137 kHz, even though the inventor assured me it could be done. John F5VLF |
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: JA7NI, Markus Vester |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: CW now on 136.5 kHz, Stefan Schäfer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?, Chris Trask |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?, Alan Melia |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |