Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: LF: Re: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: LF: Re: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?
From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:03:26 +0200
Accept-language: nl-NL, nl-BE
Acceptlanguage: nl-NL, nl-BE
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <16BC8B3CA8672445BC2A29B4C14A26D4379ED2AAB4@exlnmb01.eur.nsroot.net> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <9CD1E11E8BC9402CB4AECECAC4088443@JimPC> <00f801cc6004$c2282bd0$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <CAJqZy6yoySSmxUwW9nS6u6b7p9PK6nm4XQbFbKpKydjB70-1vw@mail.gmail.com> <004801cc6055$87313f20$4001a8c0@lark> <1313971196.2595.7.camel@pat-compaq-evo> <035601cc6065$67f3dc20$66a5fe04@ctrask>,<[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: Acxg409fiIoz0w36RA6PU6YDJuENJwACDD5H
Thread-topic: LF: Re: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?

From an engineering point of view, a scientific theory does not have to be true.  It just has to be useful. 

 

Hello John,

 

a bold statement ;-)

But it is true that for an engineer the priority is that it works, knowing how it works is a bonus, while for a scientist the last is the most important.

Being a (lonely) engineer working with scientist I sometimes try to explain the difference between a scientist and an engineer this way:

When a scientist builds a bridge it will collapse, but the scientist can perfectly explain why it collapsed. When an engineer builds a bridge it will not collapse, but the engineer will not have a clue why it does not collapse.

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>