Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Faulty FKP-1

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Faulty FKP-1
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 15:45:05 +0200
In-reply-to: <F7DB147AC432438F8811F0E44DE2A13C@JimPC>
References: <[email protected]> <52970A62D1224CAF9A966D1743DCBF00@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <4FB899125601413A9077646E2728C784@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <002101cc5947$0a6ce300$4001a8c0@lark> <[email protected]> <F7DB147AC432438F8811F0E44DE2A13C@JimPC>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3

Hello Jim, tnx for comments.

Am 13.08.2011 02:28, schrieb James Moritz:
Dear Stefan, LF Group,

These metallised film capacitors are "self healing" - if a voltage breakdown through the film occurs, the thin metallisation layers close to the puncture are vapourised, clearing the fault, with a small reduction in capacitance.
Yes, as written in the datasheet http://www.wima.de/EN/WIMA_FKP_1.pdf

So they will survive a certain amount of over-voltage events. But this can only happen a finite number of times...
Yes. In my case it seems the number of events was above the limit. And i expect the withstand voltage increases then since the arrangement becomes rather inhomogenious. And there must be a blow up due to the heat exposure, which is well visible in my case ;-)


If you look at the manufacturers' rating data, they show graphs of max. AC voltage vs. frequency. At low frequencies, the voltage is constant, the limit being the value at which the dielectric breaks down. Above some frequency which depends on the capacitor value, the voltage decreases proportional to 1/f, equivalent to saying that the capacitor current is the limitation at high frequency. If you work out what this current is, it is often suprisingly low, and many amateur TX circuits exceed the limits. But the criterion for the rated current is usually an internal temperature rise of 10 degreesC above ambient, which is quite conservative for a reasonably well-ventilated capacitor in an amateur shack, so significantly higher currents are OK in practice.

So what do you suggest? Using the caps in series to bring down the voltage per cap or switching smaller values in parallel? I think it was an overvoltage problem so i will try the series arrangement.

Just realised that it is easy to calculate things: The LC tank circuit is directly connected to the PA output. So running 120 W RF at 50 Ohm means 1.55 A rms is passing that C. At 3.5 nF this means an applied voltage of 512 V rms. This was no problem at all during the last months (TXing in QRSS-60 and so). The caps are specified to 700 V rms at 1 kHz. So when running 500 W RF, as i did during the tests of the last days, about 1 kV rms was applied. Surely this caused the breakdown. So if i design the caps for 2 kV rms, all will be fine :-) 6 A rms will be no problem for the caps i think, rather for the variometer ;-)


Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU

73, Stefan/DK7FC


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>