To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Loop TX antennas at VLF? (minor correction) |
From: | "Markus Vester" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:24:22 +0100 |
Importance: | Normal |
References: | <[email protected]> <59F87B1BA5D04A2F98902CF94C38DB30@JimPC> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Sorry, this should have said "0.07 milliohms at 9 kHz". 73, Markus From: Markus Vester Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 7:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: LF: Re: Loop TX antennas at VLF? ... For my small Maconi, I have measured an effective height of 9 m at LF, and my estimate is that this is reduced to 7 m at VLF due to increased shunt effects from nearby trees. Thus it would have a radiation resistance of 7 milliohms at 9 kHz. ... |
Previous by Date: | LF: Wasilla Alaska VLF - offline, Laurence KL7UK |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: VLF, Stefan Schäfer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Loop TX antennas at VLF?, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Loop TX antennas at VLF?, Roger Lapthorn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |