Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna? |
| From: | Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:48:37 +0100 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Z7v+pW/+Ora6lqOrrQ1GbIOnavBjL0sMroFEUmHP8fk=; b=XkrEZLU5IPSN5oGh4E0vYDCMgnU4cRCDv2iSs3l/cyYiBcdidt5XdO0XIi7TH0Vcha XQzJo/CPUBd8MgADWpAIoONYzvzjIhczCJ6neOhGiatAU5MhKWKdcGuFp1xwcxkBiiBy akf/kYtR44xoIz6isqp0gm5+e0HtOu1Stvx4g= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=uV3Utk2AaS41btT031T/kFL9nQrs/+2a0ZQFmwqyoFkb3xFlH7Q/TiAPur2bx8nsBV 205AlwCw+7rDUGddS3+1/c2aZjOHL5zDCZBxW7hBiQ9yzxnBoykQhL7HVeo7MO4jz1ut qp30gYeMdNLFvsR8B3ICwA/OxxJnR1S3Jfif4= |
| Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
| In-reply-to: | <003301cbb568$1a159780$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <003301cbb568$1a159780$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
|
Hi Mal Thank you for the response. So I will take my attenuator box to the site, connect the mast to the RX and see what happens. It will be difficult to get a receiving antenna far away enough, and I hope we will not get to much QRM from the line running up the mast for the lights, or from something else. But I will have a lot of help there. Ham engineers and operators. May be some of them will get the LF virus and get in my footsteps. Soon I'll be back with more news about this event and I'm looking forward with pleasure for our next CW QSO. Digital modes are not on the plan - maybe QRSS3 if there is a need for. 73 de Toni BTW. For those who speak German: I will report about the event on my Blog: www.funkperlen.wordpress.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest?, John Rabson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest?, Stephen McAdam |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna?, mal hamilton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna?, James Moritz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |