To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest? |
From: | John Rabson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:33:32 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]>,<532F7D4648B74CCF825F0D0E596655AF@home2361108df7>,<006901cbb595$e50b51f0$4001a8c0@lark>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
|
Previous by Date: | LF: RE: G7NKS on WSPR 136/137.5 now QRT, James Cowburn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna?, Anton Bärtschi |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest?, Laurence KL7UK |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Capacitance switch box design - what is the simplest?, Stephen McAdam |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |